Skip to main content

Security report for mhivestasoffshore.com

Mhi vestas offshore wind · Renewables & environment · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
4of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

Keep watching mhivestasoffshore.com

This scan found 7 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
84
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vestas operates in the energy sector with a focus on renewable wind energy solutions. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end wind turbine solutions including design, manufacturing, installation, and maintenance. The company targets a global audience including governments and large enterprises committed to sustainable energy. Their market position as a global leader is supported by localized country domains and a strong digital marketing ecosystem utilizing multiple analytics and advertising platforms. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests a focus on B2B relationships managed through other channels. The company demonstrates a mature partnership ecosystem and a strategic approach to digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The security posture of the Vestas website is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of modern security and analytics tools. Cookie consent management is comprehensive and GDPR compliant. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy, incident response procedures, and a security.txt file to enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with better communication and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers and verify their presence.
  2. Add visible links to security policies and incident response contacts.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies with clear user controls.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vestas
Description
Vestas is the renewable energy industry’s global partner on sustainable energy solutions. We design, manufacture, install, and service wind turbines across the globe.
Key services
Wind turbine design, Wind turbine manufacturing, Installation services, Maintenance and servicing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Cloud, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Hotjar, New Relic, Cloudflare, CookieInformation Consent Management
Frameworks
Adobe Launch
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Hotjar, Piwik Pro, New Relic
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Amplitude
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Cloud, Amplitude, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent management implemented with detailed categories and third-party processors.
  2. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicating mature digital marketing strategy.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page content provided.
  4. No visible forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and social media links.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found in the snippet.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information found.
  9. Website is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mhivestasoffshore.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mhivestasoffshore.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.