Skip to main content

Security report for mgmotor.de

MG Motor Europe · Transportation · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MG Motor Europe operates a professional website targeting Finnish customers interested in electric and hybrid vehicles. The site offers detailed product information, configurators, test drive requests, and dealer locators, positioning itself as a key player in the European electric automotive market. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging popular JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and Imgix CDN for images, hosted likely on cloud.ccm19.de. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain verification meta tags, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies in the analyzed content. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, which is common for EU domains. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mgmotor.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mgmotor.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mgmotor.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MG Motor Europe targets the transportation sector with a focus on electric and hybrid vehicles. The business model revolves around direct sales, marketing, and customer engagement through digital channels. The company offers a range of models including MG CYBERSTER, MGS5 EV, MG4, MG HS, MG ZS, and MG3. The website supports multiple European languages and countries, indicating a broad market presence. The use of configurators and test drive requests suggests a customer-centric approach. The brand maintains a consistent and professional digital presence, indicating a mature business operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes Google and Facebook domain verification meta tags, indicating attention to security and trust. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML snapshot, and no contact information for incident response or data protection officers was found. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Imgix is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible privacy or cookie policies in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers, explicit privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed SEO metadata for improved user experience and search ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MG Motor Europe
Description
MG Motor Europe offers electric vehicles and hybrids including models such as MG CYBERSTER, MGS5 EV, MG4, MG HS, MG ZS, and MG3. The site targets Finnish customers with localized content and pricing.
Key services
Electric vehicle sales, Hybrid vehicle sales, Vehicle configurator, Test drive requests, Dealer locator, Brochures and documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Imgix (image CDN), Vue Select (UI component), Swiper (carousel/slider)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification
  • Facebook domain verification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (DC-10256359)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and localized for Finland
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found in the provided HTML snapshot
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snapshot
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google marketing/analytics tools
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected
  7. No data protection officer contact information found
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Vue Select, and Swiper for UI components. It leverages Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics. Images are served via Imgix CDN for optimized delivery. The site is hosted on cloud.ccm19.de, indicating use of a specialized hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies, which are technical gaps to address.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mgmotor.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mgmotor.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.