Skip to main content

Security report for mezaattistibasfonds.lv

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds is a Latvian forestry fund focused on acquiring and managing forest lands sustainably. The company offers services including forest land purchase, fund area management, and responsible forestry practices aimed at preserving environmental diversity and increasing forest value. Their target audience includes private forest owners and companies interested in forestry investments and management within Latvia. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to their business domain. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and analytics technologies such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The website demonstrates moderate user tracking balanced with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks advanced security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content aligns well with the claimed business. Overall, the site presents a good security posture with room for improvement in security policy transparency and header implementation. The overall risk is moderate with no immediate red flags. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and improving accessibility features. These steps will strengthen trust and compliance while supporting the company’s professional image and operational security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mezaattistibasfonds.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche forestry and real estate sector in Latvia, focusing on sustainable forest management and land acquisition. Their business model revolves around purchasing forest lands from private owners and companies, managing these lands responsibly, and promoting sustainable forestry practices. This positions them as a specialized fund with a clear environmental and economic value proposition. The presence of a contact form, social media, and clear service descriptions indicates an active engagement strategy with their target market. The company appears to be small-sized with a localized market focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form inputs. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but is balanced with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear opportunities for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds
Description
Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds offers services related to forest land acquisition, forest area management, and responsible forestry in Latvia. They focus on sustainable forest management, environmental preservation, and providing competitive offers to forest owners.
Key services
Meža platību iepirkšana, Fonda platību apsaimniekošana, Atbildīga mežizstrāde
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian language targeting forestry stakeholders.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Maps API for location services. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site could benefit from additional technical enhancements such as improved accessibility features and security header implementation to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mezaattistibasfonds.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mezaattistibasfonds.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.