Skip to main content

Security report for metrostav.sk

Metrostav a.s. · Transportation · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metrostav a.s. is a large construction company primarily operating in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, specializing in transportation infrastructure and building construction. The company targets business clients and public sector projects, offering comprehensive construction and project management services. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with a focus on clear communication of privacy and cookie policies, indicating compliance with GDPR requirements. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for performance optimization and cookie consent management, ensuring a good user experience and moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-branded, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting the company's market position as a leading construction firm.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metrostav.sk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention metrostav.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for metrostav.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metrostav holds a strong market position in the transportation and construction sectors in Slovakia and neighboring regions. The business model is B2B focused, serving infrastructure and building projects. The website content and structure support this positioning, with detailed privacy and cookie policies reflecting mature data protection practices. The absence of terms of service and explicit security policies suggests areas for further maturity. The company appears to maintain a clean digital footprint with no suspicious domains or partners linked. The use of Google Analytics and AddToAny indicates standard marketing and analytics practices. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found in the provided content, which may limit direct customer engagement online.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. Security headers are partially implemented, with indications of Content-Security-Policy usage. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and readiness perception. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information and ensuring comprehensive security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and a robust Content-Security-Policy.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website to improve customer trust and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Metrostav a.s.
Registration number
00014915
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metrostav a.s.
Description
Metrostav is a construction company operating primarily in transportation infrastructure and building construction sectors. The company provides construction services and related expertise.
Key services
Infrastructure construction, Building construction, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket (performance plugin), Cookiebot (cookie consent management), AddToAny (social sharing)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (mentioned in privacy policy)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie policy.
  3. No terms of service page found.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Website built on WordPress with common plugins for performance and consent.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Contact information limited to address in privacy policy; no emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content.
  8. No social media links detected in provided HTML snippet.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses WP Rocket for performance optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and social sharing is enabled via AddToAny. The site uses modern lazy loading techniques for scripts and images, improving load times. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party scripts and caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metrostav.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metrostav.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.