Skip to main content

Security report for mercedes-benz.sk

Transportation · Slovakia

Partial score · DNS & email only

66/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mercedes-benz.sk currently returns a 502 Bad Gateway error, rendering the site inaccessible and preventing content analysis. The domain is registered since 2003 with a long-term expiry in 2034, indicating a stable and legitimate ownership consistent with the Mercedes-Benz brand presence in Slovakia. Due to the lack of accessible content, no metadata, structured data, or business information could be extracted. The technical infrastructure appears to have server-side issues causing the error, and no security headers or HTTPS validation could be performed. Privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security disclosures are absent or not accessible. Overall, the site’s digital maturity and security posture cannot be fully assessed but the domain legitimacy is high based on WHOIS data.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mercedes-benz.sk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mercedes-benz.sk

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
66

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mercedes-benz.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mercedes-benz.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain belongs to the Mercedes-Benz brand in Slovakia, a major player in the transportation and automotive sector. The domain age and registrar information support a well-established business presence. However, the website is currently non-functional, which negatively impacts customer engagement and trust. No business model details, services, or partnership information are available from the site content. The lack of accessible content and policies limits insight into operational or strategic business intelligence.

Security posture

The security posture assessment is limited due to inaccessible content. The 502 Bad Gateway error suggests server misconfiguration or backend issues. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement could be verified. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present. The domain WHOIS data shows good registration practices with transfer and update prohibitions, which is positive. Overall, the security maturity appears low from the website perspective but domain registration practices are sound.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 502 Bad Gateway error promptly to restore website availability and enable full analysis.
  2. Implement and verify HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates to ensure secure communications.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  4. Publish contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency.
  5. Deploy security headers and conduct regular security audits to enhance the security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 502 Bad Gateway error with minimal HTML content, indicating server-side blocking or misconfiguration. No WAF-specific challenge detected but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to a 502 Bad Gateway error.
  2. No visible content, metadata, or structured data available for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or forms detected.
  5. No external links or social media links present in the HTML.
  6. No scripts or technologies detected due to minimal content.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate, long-standing domain owned by a corporate entity.
  8. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content.
  9. Content safety is rated safe given absence of content.
  10. AI scoring is heavily penalized due to inaccessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a 502 Bad Gateway error, indicating backend server issues or misconfiguration. No CMS, frameworks, or technologies could be detected. The absence of metadata, scripts, or external resources suggests a non-functional or offline site state. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Performance and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. Technical debt and modernization opportunities cannot be assessed but restoring basic site functionality is critical.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium25 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mercedes-benz.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mercedes-benz.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.