Skip to main content

Security report for meldpuntroutes.nl

Meldpuntroutes · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Meldpuntroutes.nl is a specialized platform focused on enabling walkers and cyclists in the Netherlands to report issues such as blockades or missing route signs on public walking and cycling routes. The website serves a niche transportation-related public service, providing a simple interface for users to submit reports. The domain is well established since 2013, indicating a mature service presence. Technically, the site is built using Angular 13 with PrimeNG UI components, reflecting a modern web application framework. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is assumed, no explicit security headers or incident response policies are present. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie banner, but lacks explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meldpuntroutes.nl

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector, targeting walkers and cyclists in the Netherlands. Its business model is service-oriented, facilitating public reporting of route maintenance issues. The platform's market position is niche but important for local route management authorities and users. The company appears small in size with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting the business focus. There is no evidence of monetization through advertising or affiliate programs. The lack of direct contact information may limit user engagement but maintains a streamlined user experience. The domain's longevity and consistent registration data support business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is presumably enabled, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security or incident response policies and lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicate gaps in security transparency and readiness. Cookie consent is passive, which may not fully comply with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a low-risk informational service but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Upgrade cookie consent mechanism to require explicit user consent in compliance with GDPR.
  5. Add clear contact information including support emails or phone numbers to improve user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meldpuntroutes
Description
Platform for reporting issues related to walking and cycling routes such as blockades or missing route signs.
Key services
Reporting walking route issues, Reporting cycling route issues
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 13, PrimeNG UI components, CSS variables, JavaScript ES modules
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No inline scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on reporting route issues for walkers and cyclists.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page or footer.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies exist but cookie consent is passive (informational only).
  5. No security or incident response policies publicly available.
  6. Modern Angular framework used with PrimeNG components.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No social media links or external contact points found.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular 13 framework with PrimeNG UI components, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. The use of CSS variables and ES modules reflects up-to-date web standards. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking scripts were detected, suggesting a lightweight and privacy-conscious implementation. Performance is moderate with no explicit data on loading times, but the structure and assets indicate reasonable optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar Gandi. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meldpuntroutes.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meldpuntroutes.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.