Skip to main content

Security report for meistardarbnica.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.meistardarbnica.lv is a Latvian-based small retail business specializing in photo printing, document photography, and custom printing services on various items such as mugs, plates, and magnets. The site operates an e-commerce platform offering a wide range of products and services targeted at general consumers and local customers. The business appears to be positioned as a local photo studio and printing service provider with a focus on quality and affordability. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery and using common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Fancybox. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics, but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meistardarbnica.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, focusing on photo printing and custom merchandise. Its business model combines e-commerce sales with service offerings such as photography and printing for corporate events and personal needs. The product catalog is extensive, covering various categories including photo banks, mugs, plates, and souvenirs, indicating a diversified product line. The target audience is broad, including individuals and corporate clients in Latvia. The website's use of Facebook Pixel suggests active marketing efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The lack of explicit contact information on the main pages may limit customer trust and engagement. The business appears to be small-sized with a local market focus.

Security posture

The website has a basic but functional security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. The use of Facebook Pixel includes a consent check, indicating some awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The lack of a cookie consent banner is a compliance gap under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small retail site but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including phone numbers and emails for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Dažādu lietu apdruka, dokumentu foto, fotogrāfs, fotogrāfiju druka, korporatīvi pasākumi, studija
Key services
Photo printing, Document photography, Photo and print services, Corporate event photography, Studio services, Custom printing on mugs, plates, bottles, magnets, frames
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, Mozello platform scripts, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of Facebook Pixel with consent check

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian photo printing and retail e-commerce platform.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear navigation and product categories.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  7. Uses Facebook Pixel for tracking with some consent mechanism.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  10. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS, which provides a structured and manageable platform for e-commerce and content management. The front-end relies on jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox3 for UI components, with additional scripts for banners and responsive videos. Content is delivered via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, enhancing performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. The technical stack is typical for small to medium-sized retail websites and supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meistardarbnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meistardarbnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.