Skip to main content

Security report for megaturas.lt

UAB Megaturas · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Megaturas.lt is a small Lithuanian travel services company operating under the legal entity UAB Megaturas. The website is currently under maintenance with minimal content, indicating ongoing work to resume travel services. The primary contact method is via email and a Facebook page, with no phone or physical address provided. The business targets travelers seeking travel arrangements and support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and privacy policies. No forms or analytics are present, indicating a basic digital maturity level. Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS but could be improved with additional headers and policies. Overall, the site is functional but minimal, with room for enhanced compliance and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching megaturas.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention megaturas.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
2
Customers
6
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-05-15 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for megaturas.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –srv1de1.megaturas.lt2026-05-15
  • –srv1de1.megaturas.lt2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Megaturas operates in the transportation sector, likely as a travel agency or service provider. The business model focuses on travel arrangements and customer support. Market positioning appears local and small scale, with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The company maintains a Facebook presence for social engagement. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not disclosed. The lack of detailed content and policies suggests a modest digital footprint. Partnerships or related domains are not identified. The company could benefit from expanding online presence and compliance documentation to improve trust and market reach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields are present to evaluate for secure handling. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, limiting transparency. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business insights. Overall, security maturity is basic and should be enhanced to protect user data and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Introduce secure contact forms with input validation and CAPTCHA to improve user interaction and security.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Megaturas
Description
Megaturas appears to be a travel-related business continuing operations to enable travel together again. The website content is minimal and states that work is ongoing to resume services.
Key services
Travel arrangements, Customer support via email
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.10, Elementor 3.5.5, Elementor Pro 3.5.2, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab), Font Awesome 5.15.3
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimal and under update
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found
  3. Contact available only via email and Facebook link
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided
  5. No forms present on the site
  6. Uses WordPress with Elementor builder
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. HTTPS is enabled
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  10. No advertising or affiliate links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.10 with Elementor and Elementor Pro plugins, using jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile responsive and loads moderate performance scripts. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks security headers and privacy-related scripts. The technical implementation is standard for a small business but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features. The site is currently minimal in content, which may affect SEO and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with megaturas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review megaturas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.