Skip to main content

Security report for megalight.lv

Megalight Group · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Megalight Group is a small Latvian retail business specializing in the sale and consultation of designer electrical switches and sockets. Operating since 2005 from Riga, Latvia, the company targets designers, architects, electricians, builders, and end customers seeking stylish and functional electrical fittings. Their product range includes metal and ceramic switches and sockets in various shapes and colors, with additional services such as delivery and consultation. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting multiple languages including Russian, English, and Latvian. Technical infrastructure leverages modern frontend libraries like Bootstrap and Swiper.js, ensuring responsive design and moderate performance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and unavailable WHOIS data limit full trust assessment. Overall, the website presents a legitimate and professional business presence with room for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching megalight.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
88
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Megalight Group occupies a niche market in Latvia offering specialized electrical switches and sockets with a focus on design and customization. Their competitive advantage lies in product variety, quality materials, and personalized consultation services. The business model is retail-oriented with direct customer engagement and partnerships with designers and architects. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and value-added services such as delivery and consultation. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, supporting brand visibility and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with multimedia content and a product palette showcasing variety. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains megalightgroup.lv and transformme.lv, suggesting a broader business network. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy compliance and security measures to strengthen market trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied by canonical URLs but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The contact form collects user data but no visible privacy or cookie policies exist to inform users about data handling, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, limiting transparency and readiness indicators. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response preparedness to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure secure handling and validation of contact form inputs to prevent injection or data leakage vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Obtain and verify WHOIS data to confirm domain registration legitimacy and consider publishing business registration details to enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Megalight Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Megalight Group
Description
Компания предлагает широкий выбор выключателей и розеток различных дизайнов, форм и комплектаций, включая металлические и керамические варианты, с доставкой из Риги, Латвия.
Key services
Продажа выключателей и розеток, Консультации по выбору и комплектации, Организация доставки
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Swiper.js, fslightbox, jQuery (implied by plugins.js and designesia.js), CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://megalight.lv/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  4. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL usage implied but not confirmed.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube linked.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond basic UI libraries.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. Website uses modern frontend libraries and responsive design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Swiper.js for interactive sliders, and fslightbox for image lightboxes. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and viewport settings. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of some scripts and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts and alternate language links for localization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization and compliance enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with megalight.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review megalight.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.