Skip to main content

Security report for medusstrops.lv

Vīzes Drava · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medus Strops is a small Latvian e-commerce business specializing in natural honey and beekeeping products sourced from Jelgava region. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on quality and natural ingredients. The company maintains an active social media presence across multiple platforms, enhancing its market reach and customer engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, leveraging popular SEO and marketing plugins such as Yoast SEO and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and contact information pages. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business scope but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medusstrops.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medus Strops operates in the retail sector focusing on natural honey and related beekeeping products, targeting general consumers interested in natural and local products. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, leveraging WooCommerce for online sales. The company appears to be a small-sized local player with a foundation date around 2019. Its competitive advantage lies in offering 100% natural honey with unique qualities attributed to local bees. The active social media presence supports marketing and customer engagement. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The business could benefit from enhanced transparency through detailed privacy policies and contact information to build further trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident reporting.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vīzes Drava
Description
Šeit var nopirkt medu. Mūsu medus ir 100% dabīgs, čaklu bišu radīts, ar dabīgām sastāvdaļām, kas padara katru medus veidu unikālu.
Key services
Sale of natural honey, Sale of beekeeping products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Facebook Pixel, Omniva WooCommerce plugin
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via WooCommerce integration)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling natural honey and beekeeping products.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local/regional customers.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  4. Privacy policy page not found; cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Pinterest links.
  7. Security headers not detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No visible forms collecting sensitive data except standard WooCommerce checkout forms.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No incident response or security contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site loads scripts asynchronously and employs caching/minification for CSS and JS assets, indicating attention to performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, no hosting provider information was discernible from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. The technical stack is appropriate for a small e-commerce business but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more explicit privacy and contact information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medusstrops.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medusstrops.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.