Skip to main content

Security report for meatme.lv

Meat Me · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Meat Me is a small retail e-commerce business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in steak and exotic meat products. The website offers customers the ability to purchase and prepare steaks at home, targeting local consumers interested in quality meat products. The business operates through a WordPress platform using WooCommerce and the Divi theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with standard e-commerce capabilities. The site includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes but lacks visible privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no detected security headers or advanced protections. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meatme.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized meat retailer in the Riga market, focusing on steak and exotic meats. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with delivery options. The target audience includes meat enthusiasts and home cooks in Latvia. The website's use of WooCommerce suggests standard online retail operations. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. Growth potential may be tied to expanding product offerings and improving digital marketing. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense against common web attacks. No forms with explicit security measures were detected in the provided content. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces some tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. The lack of visible incident response contacts or security policies indicates limited security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be improved to protect customer data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Ensure all forms include CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meat Me
Description
Internetveikals dāvā iespēju pagatavot un nogaršot mājās paša gatavotos steikus pēc Jūsu gaumes uz pannas,cepeškrāsnī vai steiku uz grila,kā arī eksotisko gaļu.
Key services
Online sales of steak meat, Delivery service, Exotic meat offerings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, WooCommerce, WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform specializing in steak and exotic meats in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Divi theme.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage HTML content.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages not detected in the provided content.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and WooCommerce plugin, a common and flexible e-commerce stack. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are used for typography and analytics respectively. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile and SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from further optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of visible hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small e-commerce site but could be enhanced with modern security and performance best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meatme.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meatme.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.