Skip to main content

Security report for mcsriga.com

SIA Marine Consulting Service · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Marine Consulting Service is a small Latvian company specializing in maritime chemical testing and consulting services, founded in 2010. Their offerings include fuel and lubricant testing, fire system controls, water chemical analysis, and long-term monitoring of ship energy equipment. The company also provides accounting and financial services tailored to the maritime sector. The website reflects a niche service provider with a clear target audience of maritime industry professionals and companies. Technically, the site is built using Adobe Muse with legacy jQuery and includes Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. While the site is functional and professionally presented, it lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The domain registration is consistent with the business history and shows no suspicious patterns, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcsriga.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mcsriga.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mcsriga.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds an accreditation and displays logos of multiple clients, indicating established market presence in the maritime consulting niche. Their business model focuses on specialized chemical testing and consulting services, supplemented by financial and accounting support for the maritime industry. The website content and structure suggest a focus on professional maritime clients in Latvia and surrounding regions. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may limit compliance with GDPR, which is relevant given the EU location. The company’s digital footprint is modest, with no social media presence detected on the site, and limited marketing or analytics tools in use.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No DNSSEC is enabled for the domain, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. There is no visible incident response or security policy information on the site. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Marine Consulting Service
Registration number
40103324921
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Marine Consulting Service
Description
Marine Consulting Service is a company founded in 2010 by highly qualified specialists providing chemical laboratory services in the maritime sector using modern technical equipment. They specialize in fuel and lubricant testing, fire system controls, cooling and boiler water monitoring, and long-term analysis of ship energy equipment quality indicators. They also offer accounting and financial services for the maritime industry.
Key services
Fuel and lubricant physical/chemical testing, Fire system control testing, Cooling and boiler water chemical analysis, Long-term analysis of ship energy equipment, Fuel consumption data sheet development, Onboard practical operations to reduce fuel consumption, Test reports and analysis for engine/mechanism condition stabilization
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Google reCAPTCHA v3, RequireJS, Adobe Muse generated code, Font Awesome 4.0.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple contact methods.
  4. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  6. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented for form spam protection.
  7. Website built with Adobe Muse, indicating static site generation.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. Multiple client logos displayed indicating established client relationships.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected besides reCAPTCHA.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Adobe Muse, resulting in a static site with embedded legacy jQuery 1.8.3 and RequireJS for module loading. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for form spam protection. The site uses external resources from Google, BootstrapCDN, and Adobe Fonts. Hosting is provided by hostings.lv as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern web frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating potential technical debt and limited scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcsriga.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcsriga.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.