Skip to main content

Security report for mcityoffices.lv

MCITY OFFICES · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MCITY OFFICES operates as a commercial real estate leasing and property management company based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in office and warehouse space rentals across multiple business centers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses and professionals seeking functional and modern office spaces. The company demonstrates a solid market position with multiple locations and a BREEAM certification indicating environmental standards compliance. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and plugins, including Elementor, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics integrations, reflecting a moderate to good digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy policy page found. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcityoffices.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mcityoffices.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mcityoffices.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MCITY OFFICES targets the commercial real estate market in Riga, focusing on office and warehouse rentals. Their business model revolves around leasing functional, modern office spaces with tenant support services. The presence of multiple business centers and a BREEAM certification suggests a competitive advantage in sustainable building management. The company leverages digital marketing and CRM tools (Bitrix24) to engage clients. The multilingual website supports Latvian, Russian, and English audiences, indicating a broad regional reach. Revenue streams likely include rental income and ancillary services such as access cards and facility management. The company maintains clear contact channels and a professional online presence, supporting growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on forms, reducing risk of data interception and spam. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate clickjacking and XSS risks. No security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency on breach handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to avoid known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing policies, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page linked in the footer or header to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Create and publish an incident response policy with contact details for security issues to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MCITY OFFICES
Description
Biroju noma Rīgā: Biroju centri Astras, Ģertrūdes, Ulbrokas. Iznomāt funkcionālas, plašas biroja telpas ar mūsdienīgo remontu. Biroju centri MCITY.
Key services
Office space rental, Warehouse space rental, Property management, Tenant support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Elementor, Slider Revolution, Bitrix24 CRM forms, Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
Bitrix24 CRM forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple property listings
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and frameworks
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  5. Privacy policy page not found or not linked
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. BREEAM certification badge indicates environmental building standards compliance
  9. Multiple language versions available (LV, RU, EN)
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics via MonsterInsights plugin for tracking. Bitrix24 CRM forms are used for tenant support and service requests. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously to optimize performance, though overall loading speed is moderate. Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and layouts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and form labels present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data for organization and local business. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcityoffices.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcityoffices.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.