Skip to main content

Security report for mbh.fr

mont blanc hélicoptères · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mont Blanc Hélicoptères is a leading French helicopter company specializing in a wide range of aviation services including tourist flights, pilot training, emergency medical services (SAMU), mountain rescue, and helicopter maintenance. The company targets tourists, corporate clients, and aviation service customers, positioning itself as a market leader in France. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information about its services and bases across France and neighboring regions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, including SEO optimization and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA in use, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the site shows strong trust indicators such as social media presence and detailed service descriptions. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and suitable for a general audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mbh.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mbh.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mbh.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on helicopter services including private flights, sightseeing tours, and specialized operations like mountain rescue and medical emergency flights. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to both leisure and professional clients. The website reveals a broad geographic footprint with multiple bases, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with regional influence. Partnerships with training centers and reservation platforms suggest a well-integrated ecosystem. The company leverages digital marketing tools and social media to engage customers. The lack of explicit business registration or VAT information on the site is a minor gap in transparency but does not detract significantly from credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. Cookie consent is managed via Tarteaucitron, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is available. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mont blanc hélicoptères
Description
Notre compagnie d'hélicoptère est leader en France. Vols Touristiques, Formations au Pilotage, SAMU, Secours Montagne, Maintenance...
Key services
Vols Touristiques, Formations au Pilotage, SAMU, Secours Montagne, Maintenance, Vols VIP / Taxi, Vols gastronomiques, Travail aérien, Héliski
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Easy Facebook Likebox, Tarteaucitron (cookie consent), MailMunch
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
SumoMe
Tracking pixels
reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
MailMunch, Tarteaucitron
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain not found.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with a consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn links.
  8. Uses multiple third-party scripts and plugins common in WordPress sites.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced UI and location services. The site uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, MailMunch, and SumoMe. Performance is moderate with some scope for optimization. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are basic but functional. The technical stack is standard for a professional service website but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mbh.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mbh.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.