Skip to main content

Security report for maxiline.lv

MAXILINE · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MAXILINE is a Latvian logistics and freight forwarding company with over 20 years of experience, offering comprehensive transportation services including land, sea, and air freight, cargo insurance, warehouse services, and brokerage for export/import documentation. The company targets businesses requiring reliable and timely cargo delivery and logistics support. The website is built on WordPress with modern frontend technologies, providing a professional and navigable user experience. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers indicate room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the website presents a credible business front with moderate technical maturity and security readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxiline.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MAXILINE operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight and logistics services in Latvia. The company leverages its 20+ years of experience as a competitive advantage. Its business model centers on service provision to commercial clients needing cargo transport and related services. The website shows membership in local business organizations, indicating community integration and trust. The lack of detailed corporate data such as founding year or registration numbers limits deeper business intelligence. No analytics or marketing tools are evident, suggesting a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The company maintains a clear service portfolio and contact channels, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms on the homepage reduce risk of data leakage or injection vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. No known vulnerabilities or suspicious scripts were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and marketing tools with privacy-respecting configurations to improve business intelligence and user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MAXILINE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MAXILINE
Description
MAXILINE is a logistics and freight transportation company offering land full or partial cargo, sea and air freight services, cargo insurance and escort, warehouse services including storage, loading, unloading and transshipment, and brokerage services for export/import/transit documentation.
Key services
Freight transportation, Cargo insurance and escort, Warehouse services, Brokerage services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, MasterSlider, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, React (vendor scripts)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive info on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on homepage or footer.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No forms detected on homepage; minimal data collection observed.
  6. Uses modern WordPress theme and common JS libraries.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source; HTTPS is used.
  9. Business is logistics focused with clear service offerings.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and common JavaScript libraries like jQuery, MasterSlider, and Owl Carousel for UI components. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome for icons. React vendor scripts are included but not evidently used in visible content. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider components. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML. The technical stack is modern but basic, with opportunities for performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxiline.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxiline.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.