Skip to main content

Security report for matrixshipmanagement.com

Matrix Ship Management Ltd · Transportation · Cyprus

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Matrix Ship Management Ltd is a Cyprus-based maritime service provider specializing in comprehensive ship management solutions including crew, technical, hotel services, training, and consultancy. With over 30 years of industry experience, the company positions itself as a flexible and safety-focused partner for vessel owners and operators worldwide. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by client testimonials and recognized certifications such as ISM and ISPS codes. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack with Bootstrap, jQuery, and multiple analytics tools, hosted likely on Microsoft Online infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy present, though GDPR compliance is not explicitly indicated. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-structured, suitable for its target maritime audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching matrixshipmanagement.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Matrix Ship Management operates in the transportation sector, focusing on ship management services. Its business model is service-oriented, offering both turnkey and bespoke solutions to international shipping companies. The company leverages its 30 years of experience and certifications to maintain a competitive edge, emphasizing safety and quality. The presence of multiple client testimonials and industry awards indicates strong client relationships and market credibility. The company actively uses digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience. The website's content and structure support lead generation through contact forms and career portals, indicating a growth-oriented strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. The site does not publish a security policy or incident response contact, limiting transparency in security governance. Forms are present and appear to use third-party services (JotForm), which may provide some security but also introduce dependencies. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were found, improvements in DNS security, header implementation, and policy transparency are recommended to enhance the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish a comprehensive GDPR compliance statement and update privacy practices accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Matrix Ship Management Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Matrix Ship Management Ltd
Description
Matrix Ship Management is a ship management company with deep experience across all vessel types. They deliver a complete range of ship management services including full vessel management, crew management, training, auditing, and consultancy. They prioritize safety, quality, and environmental protection.
Key services
Audit & Inspection, Full Vessel Management, Crew Management, New Build Supervision, Technical Management, Hotel Services Management, Training, Survey & Consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, JotForm
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related certifications (ISM, ISPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, StatCounter
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
StatCounter
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Matomo
Marketing tools
HubSpot, JotForm
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. Multiple client testimonials and certifications enhance trust.
  3. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates active digital marketing.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  6. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Analytics are handled via Matomo, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and StatCounter, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and marketing. Hosting appears to be managed via Microsoft Online DNS infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected but responsive design is well implemented. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses multiple embedded forms via JotForm, which simplifies data collection but introduces external dependencies. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with matrixshipmanagement.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review matrixshipmanagement.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.