Skip to main content

Security report for masteredit.com

2exVia · Technology · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

2exVia is a well-established French digital communication and marketing agency with over 25 years of experience. They offer a broad range of services including custom web and app development, video production, brand identity, and social media management. Their proprietary CMS, MasterEdit®, powers over 250 websites, demonstrating technical maturity and a strong market presence. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as Matomo analytics and lazy loading for performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional content and social media presence. Overall, the site represents a credible and competent digital agency with a solid technical foundation.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching masteredit.com

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and organizations seeking comprehensive digital communication solutions. Their business model is service-based, focusing on custom development and marketing services. The agency's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary CMS and long-standing client relationships. The portfolio showcases diverse projects including e-commerce and web applications, indicating versatility. The presence on major social media platforms supports marketing efforts and client engagement. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but may be due to privacy protection or recent domain registration. The agency operates primarily in France and serves a medium-sized market segment with potential for growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS, SSL management, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of HTTP security headers and a published security policy or incident response information indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a privacy-conscious approach compared to more invasive trackers. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
2exVia
Description
2exVia is a communication and digital marketing agency with over 25 years of experience, offering custom web and app development, website creation (showcase and e-commerce), mobile app development, video production, motion design, 3D content creation, brand identity, printed media, and social media management.
Key services
Web development, Mobile app development, Video and motion design, Brand identity and printed media, Social media strategy and community management, Hosting and website maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Matomo Analytics, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Vimeo embedded video, Google Fonts (Space Grotesk), Tarte au citron (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and SSL mention)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Hosting and SSL managed by agency
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent management
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, reducing transparency
  6. Website uses proprietary CMS MasterEdit® with hosting in France
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  9. No forms detected on the analyzed page, but contact page exists
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and efficient tech stack including jQuery, lazy loading libraries, Matomo analytics, and Vimeo for video content. The proprietary CMS MasterEdit® is central to their offering, supporting multi-language, intranet, e-commerce, and newsletter functionalities. Hosting is managed in France with SSL certificates handled by the agency, ensuring data sovereignty and security. Performance is moderate with optimizations for speed and mobile responsiveness. The site includes SEO best practices and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and formal policies suggests opportunities for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with masteredit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review masteredit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.