Skip to main content

Security report for martinrozesstendins.lv

Mārupes pagasta zemnieku saimniecība “Mārtiņrozes” · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mārupes pagasta zemnieku saimniecība “Mārtiņrozes” is a small Latvian agricultural business founded in 2018, specializing in the cultivation and sale of vegetables, herbs, fruits, and other crops. The company operates an e-commerce platform alongside local sales channels such as a self-service stand and direct delivery within Latvia. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, providing a functional and user-friendly shopping experience primarily targeting local consumers interested in fresh and processed farm products. The business maintains a consistent brand presence with clear product offerings and contact points.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching martinrozesstendins.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention martinrozesstendins.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for martinrozesstendins.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mārtiņrozes operates in the retail and e-commerce sector focused on agricultural products in Latvia. Its business model centers on direct-to-consumer sales through an online store and local physical points, supported by delivery services. The company targets local consumers seeking fresh and artisanal farm products. The website content and structure support this model effectively, though the lack of detailed business registration or WHOIS data limits external verification. Social media presence is limited to Facebook, indicating a modest digital marketing footprint. The business appears stable and consistent with a small-scale agricultural enterprise.

Security posture

The site demonstrates a basic but sound security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not provide published incident response or security policies. No cookie consent banner is present, which may impact GDPR compliance. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts indicates limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add a Content-Security-Policy header to enhance protection against cross-site scripting and other attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider expanding social media and marketing efforts to increase brand visibility and customer engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mārupes pagasta zemnieku saimniecība “Mārtiņrozes”
Description
Liepiņu ģimenes audzēta produkcija , audzētās Mārtiņrožu zemītē! Dārzeņu, garšaugu, ārstniecisko augu, augļu, riekstu, vīnogu un citu kultūru audzēšana un pārdošana.
Key services
Fresh vegetable and fruit cultivation, Herbs and medicinal plants cultivation, E-commerce sales, Local delivery and self-service stand sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Slider, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure plugins (WooCommerce, Contact Form 7)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce site for a small Latvian farm business.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear business focus on fresh and processed farm products.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress plugins.
  8. Site uses HTTPS and standard security practices but lacks advanced headers like CSP.
  9. Contact information is available but no explicit phone or email found in HTML content.
  10. Privacy policy page is present and appears basic but adequate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress and WooCommerce stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile optimized. However, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with martinrozesstendins.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review martinrozesstendins.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.