Skip to main content

Security report for martinevancamp.be

Vzw Martine Van Camp · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vzw Martine Van Camp is a well-established non-profit organization based in Belgium, founded in 2000, providing specialized care and support services to persons with disabilities. Their service offerings include day support, guided work, residential support, short-term stays, home guidance, and directly accessible help. The organization is officially recognized and subsidized by the Flemish Agency for Persons with Disabilities, positioning it as a trusted regional care provider. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their target audience. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with Bootstrap and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, showing a moderate to good level of digital maturity and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though it lacks some advanced security and incident response disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching martinevancamp.be

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on disability care, targeting individuals with disabilities and their families. Their business model centers on providing tailored care solutions funded partly through government subsidies. The website indicates a medium-sized operation with a clear market position supported by official recognition and partnerships. Their digital presence includes multiple Facebook pages for different service areas, enhancing community engagement. The partnership with SANZA for website development suggests a professional approach to digital services. Revenue streams likely include government funding and possibly donations or grants. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service portfolio and active communication channels. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance and enhancing security transparency to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. The use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics is configured with limited ad personalization, reflecting privacy-conscious analytics practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit organization but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures to prevent automated abuse.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vzw Martine Van Camp
Description
Vzw Martine Van Camp biedt gespecialiseerde zorg en ondersteuning aan personen met een (vermoeden van) beperking op vlak van leven, wonen en vrije tijd. De organisatie richt zich op het bieden van oplossingen op maat die aansluiten bij de zorgvraag van cliënten.
Key services
Dagondersteuning, Begeleid werken, Woonondersteuning, Logeren, Begeleiding aan huis, Rechtstreeks Toegankelijke Hulp
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Bootstrap 3.4.5, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo embed
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Drupal 10 based non-profit care organization site.
  2. Content is in Dutch (nl) and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. Cookie compliance banner with opt-in is implemented.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response info publicly available.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via form.
  6. Social media presence mainly on Facebook with multiple related pages.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Site uses Google Analytics via GTM with privacy settings limiting ad personalization.
  10. Site is mobile optimized and accessible with skip links and ARIA roles.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Drupal 10 CMS platform with Bootstrap 3.4.5 for responsive design. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and embeds Vimeo videos for rich media content. Hosting is provided by Combell nv, a reputable provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS files loaded including from CDN sources. The site uses a cookie compliance banner with opt-in functionality, reflecting GDPR awareness. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Opportunities exist to modernize Bootstrap to a newer version and optimize asset loading for improved speed. Technical risks are low but include missing security headers and lack of explicit security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with martinevancamp.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review martinevancamp.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.