Skip to main content

Security report for martinbugner.com

Martin Bugner · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Martin Bugner operates a small-scale personal web development and WordPress optimization service primarily targeting clients seeking fast and optimized websites. The website is minimalistic, serving as a temporary presentation with clear contact details and a straightforward business description. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with the stated temporary nature of the site and upcoming new presentation. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks or analytics detected. Hosting and DNS are provided by Czech-based providers, aligning with the website's Czech language and contact information. Security posture is modest, with no advanced security headers or policies implemented, and no privacy or cookie policies present, indicating low compliance maturity. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching martinbugner.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention martinbugner.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for martinbugner.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a personal brand in the technology sector, focusing on web development and WordPress services. It targets small businesses or individuals needing website creation and optimization. The business model is service-based with direct client engagement. The lack of extensive content or marketing tools suggests a nascent or transitional phase. The transparent WHOIS data and clear contact information support credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated, and no advertising or analytics tools are used, reflecting a lean operational approach.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers are present. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. No tracking or analytics scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user insights. The site does not appear to be protected by a WAF or similar security mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small personal site but requires improvements to meet professional standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Add incident response contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  5. Consider deploying HTTPS enforcement and regular security audits to strengthen security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
11262427
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Martin Bugner
Description
Stavím rychlé webové stránky. Opravuji, optimalizuji WordPress.
Key services
Web development, WordPress repair, WordPress optimization
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple, small-scale personal business site for web development services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating low compliance maturity.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone number.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Website content is minimal but relevant and safe.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent with no privacy protection.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, with no detected JavaScript frameworks or libraries. The site appears to be hosted on Czech infrastructure consistent with the registrar and DNS providers. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and absence of heavy scripts. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility features are limited. The site would benefit from modernization including enhanced SEO, accessibility improvements, and adoption of modern web technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with martinbugner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review martinbugner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.