Skip to main content

Security report for marsruti.lv

Transportation · Lithuania

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.stops.lt provides comprehensive public transport route schedules and trip planning services primarily for Vilnius, Lithuania. It offers detailed information on bus, trolleybus, express bus, and night routes, targeting local commuters and visitors. The site supports multiple languages and includes interactive features such as maps and route planners. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates third-party analytics and social media SDKs. While the content quality and user experience are good, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. Security posture is moderate with no evident advanced security headers or policies, and WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is functional and informative but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching marsruti.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as an important information service within the transportation sector, focusing on public transit in Vilnius. It likely serves a niche audience of daily commuters and tourists seeking route and schedule information. The business model appears to be informational, possibly supported by municipal or transport authority funding or partnerships. The presence of Facebook and Google Analytics indicates some level of user engagement tracking. The lack of explicit business contact details and WHOIS transparency limits deeper insights into organizational structure or revenue streams. The site’s multi-language support and detailed route data suggest a commitment to accessibility and user service. No direct commercial or e-commerce activities are evident.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided HTML. There is no evidence of security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The WHOIS data failure to retrieve domain registration details reduces trust and raises questions about domain legitimacy. The site uses third-party analytics and social media scripts, which may introduce privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure domain WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Review and optimize third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Public transport route schedules and planning for Vilnius city, including bus, trolleybus, express bus, and night routes.
Key services
Route schedules, Trip planner, Transport maps, Real-time vehicle tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about Vilnius public transport routes and schedules.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  4. Use of Facebook and Google Analytics scripts indicates user tracking but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  6. Website is multi-lingual with language selection links.
  7. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No forms with sensitive data collection detected except for route planning inputs.
  9. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Facebook SDK for social media features and Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika for user analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and supports multiple languages. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility is basic with some focus on keyboard navigation and screen reader compatibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site could benefit from modernization and enhanced technical controls to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with marsruti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review marsruti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.