Markgrafenkirchen e.V. is a non-profit organization dedicated to the cultural, spiritual, and touristic promotion of the Markgrafenkirchen churches in Upper Franconia, Germany. The website serves as a comprehensive resource offering detailed information about nearly 60 churches, including photos, events, tours, and educational materials. The organization is positioned as a niche cultural heritage promoter with a strong regional focus and supported by European Union funding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security plugins, though improvements can be made in cookie consent and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, serving its target audience effectively.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
62
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention markgrafenkirchen.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for markgrafenkirchen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization operates in the non-profit cultural sector, focusing on heritage tourism and education. Its business model relies on EU funding, donations, and memberships. The website acts as a central hub for tourists, educators, and local communities interested in Baroque churches. The presence of multilingual support and extensive content updates indicates active engagement and growth potential. Partnerships with regional tourism boards and related cultural sites enhance its ecosystem. The organization maintains a clear brand identity and consistent messaging, reinforcing its market position as a key promoter of Markgrafenkirchen heritage.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and uses security plugins such as Wordfence, indicating a baseline security awareness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of cookie consent mechanisms and explicit security or incident response policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user transparency.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Regularly audit and update all plugins and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Consider adding terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Markgrafenkirchen e.V.
Description
Touristic, cultural, spiritual and scientific exploration of Markgrafenkirchen churches in Upper Franconia, Germany. The site offers information about nearly 60 selected churches, including photos, descriptions, events, and related tours.
Key services
Information about Markgrafenkirchen churches, Event listings, Tour guides and maps, Educational materials, Fundraising and membership
Use of security plugin Wordfence (indicated by script)
Analytics and tracking
Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
Strong focus on cultural heritage and tourism promotion for Markgrafenkirchen churches.
Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR compliance in privacy policy.
No visible security policy or incident response information.
No terms of service page detected.
Contact information includes email and social media but no phone or physical address explicitly found in provided content.
Use of modern web technologies and WordPress plugins.
No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram confirmed.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins including Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. It uses modern JavaScript frameworks like Vue.js and Vuex for interactive components. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preloading for performance. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit but DNS uses professional name servers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with markgrafenkirchen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review markgrafenkirchen.de.