Skip to main content

Security report for marinamalina.eu

MARINA MALINA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Marina Malina is a local marina service provider located in Riga, Latvia, offering boat mooring and water leisure services. The website targets boating enthusiasts and local residents interested in water activities. The business operates in the transportation sector with a small business size and a clear local market focus. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and provides clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address. It integrates social media presence via Facebook and includes a Google Maps location for easy navigation. Technically, the website uses a somewhat dated but stable technology stack including Bootstrap 3.3.2 and jQuery 1.11.2, with additional libraries like Magnific Popup for image handling. The site is mobile optimized and has basic accessibility and SEO features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, no CMS or advanced platform is detected, indicating a custom or static site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS, which could improve its security posture. No privacy policy or terms of service are published, though a cookie consent banner is present disclosing Google Analytics usage. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The WHOIS data shows the domain is registered through a reputable registrar with no privacy protection, consistent with the business profile. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security practices and formal privacy and legal policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching marinamalina.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Marina Malina holds a local market position as a marina and boat mooring service provider in Riga, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its scenic location on the Ķīšezers lake and Juglas canal, appealing to boating enthusiasts and local residents. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing mooring and related water leisure services. Revenue streams likely come from mooring fees and ancillary services. The target customer segment is local and regional boat owners and water sports participants. The website indicates a small business scale with no parent or subsidiary companies. Partnership with the website developer (majas-lapu.lv) is evident. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multilingual support suggests an intent to reach broader audiences. Strategic observations include the need for formalized privacy and security policies to align with regulatory expectations and enhance market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and security policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The cookie consent mechanism is present but basic. There is no evidence of a security culture or advanced security controls. The business impact of these gaps is moderate given the nature of the site, but improvements are recommended to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve legal compliance and readiness.
  4. Upgrade technology stack to more recent versions of libraries and frameworks to reduce vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MARINA MALINA
Description
Laivu piestātne MARINA MALINA atrodas ainaviski skaistajā Ķīšezera krastā pie Juglas kanāla. Tā ir piemērota vieta aktīvai atpūtai uz ūdens. Laipni lūgti Marina Malina!
Key services
Boat mooring, Water leisure services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 3.3.2, jQuery 1.11.2, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses HTTPS (implied by URL https://marinamalina.eu/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook Like Button
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local marina service site in Riga, Latvia
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switch options for English and Russian
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent banner present with Google Analytics disclosure
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address
  6. No forms detected on the main page
  7. Uses Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 1.11.2, indicating somewhat dated but functional tech stack
  8. No advanced security headers detected
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML
  10. Facebook page linked and integrated with like button
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 3.3.2 and jQuery 1.11.2, which are stable but outdated technologies. It uses Magnific Popup for image galleries and integrates Facebook SDK and Google Analytics scripts. The site is responsive and mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. No CMS or advanced platform detected, suggesting a custom-built or static site. Performance is moderate with no major errors or broken elements. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The site uses HTTPS but does not implement advanced security headers. There is opportunity for modernization and technical improvements to enhance security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with marinamalina.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review marinamalina.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.