Skip to main content

Security report for mar-ta.lv

MARTA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MARTA is a small-scale business focused on autonomous and sustainable maritime transportation technologies, positioning itself as a future-oriented player in the transportation sector. The website serves primarily as an informational and promotional platform with minimal content and no e-commerce or interactive features. Technically, the site is built using the Publii Open-Source CMS, a static site generator, which contributes to a low attack surface and moderate performance. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is limited to a single company email address with no phone or physical address details provided. Overall, the website demonstrates basic digital maturity with room for improvement in content richness, security posture, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mar-ta.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MARTA operates in the niche maritime transportation sector with a focus on autonomous and sustainable sailing technologies. The business model appears informational and promotional, targeting general audiences interested in maritime innovation. The company is likely small in size and based in Latvia, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust indicators suggests an early-stage or specialized project rather than a large enterprise. The absence of analytics and advertising tools indicates a low emphasis on marketing or user tracking. Strategic partnerships or related domains are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing exposure to injection attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is basic but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide additional contact information such as phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish security and incident response policies, including vulnerability disclosure channels.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement and improve the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MARTA
Description
MARTA appears to be a business focused on autonomous, sustainable maritime transportation, emphasizing future-oriented sailing technology.
Key services
Autonomous sailing technology, Sustainable maritime solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses provided, only email contact.
  4. No forms detected on the site for data collection.
  5. Site built with Publii CMS, a static site generator, indicating low complexity and attack surface.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly informational with a focus on autonomous maritime technology.
  9. No security headers detected, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Publii CMS, a static site generator, which simplifies deployment and reduces server-side vulnerabilities. The tech stack includes standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery libraries for UI effects. The site loads fonts and stylesheets from its own domain, minimizing third-party dependencies. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive design elements. SEO is basic with canonical links and Open Graph metadata but lacks rich content and structured data beyond basic organization schema. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. The site does not use analytics or advertising technologies, reducing privacy risks but limiting marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mar-ta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mar-ta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.