Skip to main content

Security report for manspasts.lv

Latvijas Pasts · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MansPasts.lv is the official business client portal for Latvijas Pasts, the national postal service of Latvia. The website provides business customers with tools for managing postal shipments, parcel machine orders, and shipment tracking. It clearly distinguishes itself from the private user portal mans.pasts.lv, directing private users accordingly. The site features official branding, contact information, and social media links consistent with Latvijas Pasts' identity. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and session management features, but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business claims. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manspasts.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a critical digital channel for Latvijas Pasts to engage business clients, offering postal and logistics services tailored to corporate needs. Its market position as the national postal operator is reinforced by consistent branding and official domain usage. The business model focuses on B2B postal shipment management, parcel services, and customer support. The presence of a separate private user portal suggests a clear segmentation strategy. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes the main Latvijas Pasts domain and related private portals. Growth indicators include integration of chat support and modern web technologies. However, the lack of detailed privacy and security policies may impact trust among privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and session timeout mechanisms implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent and detailed privacy policy disclosures. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR requirements.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  3. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance security posture.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Pasts
Description
Website for business clients of Latvijas Pasts, the Latvian postal service. Provides services related to postal shipments and parcel management for business customers. Directs private users to a separate portal mans.pasts.lv.
Key services
Business postal shipment management, Parcel machine orders, Shipment tracking, Customer support chat
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery Autocomplete, Slick Slider, XCALLY Motion Chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Session timeout modal implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is targeted at business clients of Latvijas Pasts.
  2. Clear separation from private user portal mans.pasts.lv.
  3. Use of official branding and logos consistent with Latvijas Pasts.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and chat support for customer service.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with official phone numbers and email.
  8. Social media links point to official Latvijas Pasts accounts.
  9. No forms with personal data collection visible on landing page; login and registration pages linked but not analyzed here.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics, jQuery Autocomplete, and Slick Slider for UI components. It integrates XCALLY Motion Chat for customer support. Hosting is managed via Microsoft Azure DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Montserrat font from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO and accessibility are basic, with scope for improvement in metadata and ARIA attributes. No CMS or backend platform was explicitly detected from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manspasts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manspasts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.