Skip to main content

Security report for manobustas.lt

Mano Būstas · Real Estate · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mano Būstas is a Lithuanian company specializing in comprehensive multi-apartment building maintenance services. The website presents the company as a professional service provider focused on smart solutions, property value growth, and clean environments. The target audience includes apartment owners and property managers in Lithuania. The business model centers on providing maintenance, management, and cleaning services to residential buildings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap framework, integrating modern analytics and chat support tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Chatwoot. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with proper metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, includes key security headers, and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with moderate technical maturity and good privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manobustas.lt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention manobustas.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for manobustas.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mano Būstas operates in the Real Estate sector, specifically targeting multi-apartment building maintenance in Lithuania. The company leverages digital tools for customer engagement and analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Its market position appears stable with a focus on professionalism and smart solutions. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from property maintenance contracts. The presence of Facebook and Google tracking suggests active marketing and retargeting efforts. The company maintains GDPR compliance and provides clear contact channels, enhancing customer trust. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small-sized business. The website content quality and branding consistency support a positive market image.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of multiple security headers (HSTS, X-Frame-Options, CSP, etc.), and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts like Chatwoot and Facebook Pixel requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mano Būstas
Description
Visos jūsų daugiabučio priežiūros paslaugos. Profesionalumas, išmanūs sprendimai, auganti turto vertė, švari aplinka.
Key services
Daugiabučių priežiūra, Turto valdymas, Švaros paslaugos, Išmanūs sprendimai
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.6, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Chatwoot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Chatwoot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or registration dates extracted.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern frameworks and tracking tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is available via email, phone, and contact form.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website is well-branded and professionally designed with good SEO.
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4.6 for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, along with Chatwoot for live chat support. The site uses modern SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD), Open Graph, and Twitter Card metadata. Performance is moderate, with preloading of key images and fonts. Mobile optimization is good, and the site includes cookie consent management via Cookiebot. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced security headers or mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence appropriate for a small service business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manobustas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manobustas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.