Skip to main content

Security report for mannlines.com

Mann Lines · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mann Lines is a privately owned shipping and logistics company specializing in liner ro-ro and container vessel services, ships agency, warehousing, forwarding, and distribution primarily in the North Sea and Baltic regions. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services and subsidiaries, targeting a broad audience involved in transportation and logistics. Technically, the site uses a range of established JavaScript libraries and Google Maps API to enhance user experience, though some libraries are outdated. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers information available from the data, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mannlines.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mann Lines operates in the transportation sector with a focus on shipping and logistics services including ro-ro shipping, multimodal shipping, warehousing, port operations, and forwarding. The company maintains multiple subsidiaries across Europe, indicating a regional presence and diversified operations. The business model revolves around providing integrated shipping and logistics solutions to automotive, engineering, and industrial clients. The website content suggests a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position in Northern Europe. However, the lack of detailed business registration data and contact information on the site limits full verification of business credibility. The company appears to rely on traditional shipping routes and established ports, leveraging owned and leased facilities to support operations.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate but incomplete. There is no explicit evidence of HTTPS enforcement or modern security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The site uses older versions of jQuery, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, reducing transparency and preparedness perception. No contact channels for security incidents or abuse are provided. Overall, the security posture requires significant enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Conduct a full security audit and vulnerability assessment to identify and remediate risks.
  7. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and trust.
  8. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and ownership transparency.
  9. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users.
  10. Enhance SEO and metadata completeness to improve search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mann Lines
Description
Mann Lines and its sister companies are privately owned companies providing liner ro-ro and container vessel services, ships agency, stevedoring, chilled and ambient warehousing, forwarding, chilled and ambient distribution and European express freight.
Key services
Ro-Ro Shipping, Multimodal Shipping, Warehousing and Distribution, Port Operations, Ships Agency, Forwarding and Connections
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, jQuery Migrate 1.2.1, WOW.js, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, ScrollMagic, Snap.svg, Google Maps API v3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. The site uses multiple external libraries and Google Maps API for interactive features.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  6. The site appears to represent a legitimate shipping and logistics business based on content.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information is provided.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard libraries.
  9. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
  10. The site has moderate technical implementation with some outdated libraries (jQuery 1.11.3).
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 1.11.3 and associated plugins like Slick Carousel, WOW.js, and Magnific Popup. Google Maps API is integrated for location visualization. The site uses Bootstrap CSS for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO basics but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies on CDNs. Mobile optimization is good but accessibility is basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features, indicating potential technical debt and modernization opportunities. Security-related technical controls are minimal or not visible in the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mannlines.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mannlines.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.