Skip to main content

Security report for mailworld.se

Mailworld · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mailworld is a Swedish company specializing in postal cost optimization and mail distribution services, targeting businesses that send domestic and international mail. The company positions itself as a challenger to traditional postal services by offering lower postage prices without requiring clients to change their routines. Key services include domestic economical letters, office mail handling, international mail, and unsorted shipments. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and provides clear contact information including emails, phone numbers, and a contact form. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and spam protection on forms, though explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional, secure, and credible but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mailworld.se

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mailworld.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mailworld.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mailworld operates in the transportation sector, focusing on postal services with a business model centered on cost optimization for mail distribution. The company targets small to medium-sized businesses in Sweden that require economical and international mailing solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in offering lower postage prices through optimized distribution networks and partnerships with established postal providers like PostNord and CityMail. The partnership ecosystem includes domains such as 21grams.se, addoro.com, europepost.eu, and stralfors.com, indicating a collaborative approach to service delivery. The company was founded in 2015, consistent with domain registration data, and maintains a small organizational size. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of modern web technologies. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve trust and compliance by publishing detailed privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of cookie consent management via Usercentrics. Contact forms are protected with Akismet spam filtering, reducing risk of abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security or incident response policies limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks comprehensive privacy policy documentation. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mailworld
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mailworld
Description
Mailworld sänker era portokostnader - utan rutinförändringar! Vi tar hand om era ekonomibrev, er kontorspost & internationella sändningar.
Key services
Inrikes ekonomibrev (domestic economical letters), Kontorspost (office mail), Internationell post (international mail), Osorterade sändningar (unsorted shipments)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Flickity carousel, Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager, Akismet, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Usercentrics for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms with spam protection (Akismet)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
BidTheatre
Tracking pixels
Upsales pixel
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish targeting Swedish businesses.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics CMP.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with emails, phone numbers, and a contact form.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent business presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.7.2, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 for form handling, and Akismet for spam protection. The front-end uses jQuery and Flickity for interactive carousels. Cookie consent is managed by Usercentrics CMP, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. Hosting appears to be provided by 21grams.se, a partner domain. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses canonical URLs and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Technical debt is low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy documentation to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mailworld.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mailworld.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.