Skip to main content

Security report for magneticleasing.com

Magnetic Leasing · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magnetic Leasing is a specialized company focused on aircraft leasing, trading, and asset management, primarily targeting mature Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 aircraft families. Founded in 2019, the company serves airlines and maintenance organizations worldwide, leveraging technical expertise and synergy with its MRO operations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and a strong partner ecosystem. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and includes advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag, complemented by a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA Enterprise protecting forms, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident. Overall, the domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with the business profile, and no suspicious patterns were detected. The site offers a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magneticleasing.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magnetic Leasing occupies a niche in the aviation transportation sector, focusing on leasing and managing mature aircraft fleets and components. Its business model revolves around providing cost-efficient and reliable fleet solutions to airlines and maintenance organizations. The company benefits from a curated asset portfolio and technical expertise from its MRO synergy, positioning it competitively in the market. The partnership with Magnetic Group and visible client logos indicate a strong partnership ecosystem. The company targets global airline operators and aviation market players, with growth indicators visible through recent news and active social media engagement. Revenue streams likely include leasing contracts, asset management fees, and trading transactions. The website content and structure support a professional and credible market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect user input forms. Cookie consent management is implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of explicit security or incident response policies on the website is a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and publicly available incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding direct verified contact emails and phone numbers for improved business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magnetic Leasing
Description
Magnetic Leasing offers expert aircraft leasing, asset management, and component trading solutions. Specializing in Airbus & Boeing parts, serving airlines worldwide.
Key services
Asset Management, Leasing, Trading
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to aircraft leasing and asset management
  3. Strong integration with marketing and analytics tools with privacy consent mechanisms
  4. WHOIS data is redacted but domain appears legitimate and consistent with business claims
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site; contact via form only
  6. Social media presence is active and linked
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates popular carousel libraries Owl Carousel and Slick Carousel for UI elements and AOS for animations. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is used for bot protection on forms, and Google Tag Manager along with LinkedIn Insight Tag are employed for analytics and marketing tracking. CookieYes manages cookie consent to ensure GDPR compliance. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magneticleasing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magneticleasing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.