Skip to main content

Security report for magnatgroup.lv

Magnat Group · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magnat Group is an established Latvian company with over 30 years of experience in port operations, international trade, and investment projects. The company operates multiple terminals at the Port of Riga and serves clients in over 20 countries, aiming to be a global partner for market entry and long-term partnerships. Their website reflects a professional business presence with clear service offerings and certifications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, showing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers could enhance protection. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional, GDPR compliant, and business credible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magnatgroup.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magnat Group holds a strong market position in transportation and trade sectors, leveraging port terminal operations and investment projects as core revenue streams. Their business model focuses on facilitating international trade and logistics through their terminals and services. The company targets businesses seeking port and trade services internationally, supported by ISO certifications that enhance trust. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and clear communication of services. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct business relationships rather than broad consumer marketing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. However, the lack of several key security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) indicates room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which could be a gap in security transparency. The blocking of Google Maps iframe until cookie consent is a positive privacy practice. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and plugin versions, but continuous monitoring for plugin vulnerabilities is recommended. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional headers and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding social media or professional network links to enhance business credibility and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magnat Group
Description
Magnat Group is a dynamic and experienced company with more than 30 years of history in the Latvian and international markets. The company started with port activities in the Freeport of Riga and expanded into international trade and investment. They aim to become a global partner enabling clients to enter new markets and build long-term partnerships worldwide.
Key services
Port terminal operations, Trade and services, Investment projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.24.5, Elementor Pro 3.24.1, Yoast SEO 23.8, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Site uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact info includes phone, email, and contact form.
  6. Multiple ISO certifications displayed indicating quality and compliance.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  9. Google Maps iframe is blocked until marketing cookies consented.
  10. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature CMS environment optimized for SEO and user experience. The use of Google Fonts, jQuery, and Swiper.js supports a visually appealing and interactive design. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and prefetching techniques implemented. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks visible hosting provider information and advanced security configurations such as CSP headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magnatgroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magnatgroup.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.