Skip to main content

Security report for maatjez.nl

MantelZ · Non-profit · Netherlands

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MantelZ is a small non-profit organization based in the Netherlands that provides support and resources to informal caregivers (mantelzorgers) and professionals in caregiving within specific municipalities. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with integrated SEO and privacy compliance tools, including GDPR cookie consent and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site offers comprehensive contact options, including email, phone, physical address, and contact forms, enhancing accessibility and user engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers could improve protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence aligned with its mission to support caregivers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maatjez.nl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention maatjez.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for maatjez.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MantelZ operates as a regional support center for informal caregivers, focusing on providing free services such as counseling, activities, and volunteer coordination. Its business model is non-profit, likely funded by local municipalities or public grants. The organization targets caregivers and professionals in the healthcare and social support sectors within the Netherlands. The website content and structure reflect a clear focus on community support and engagement, with testimonials and calls to action that reinforce trust. The partnership with maatjez.nl indicates a collaborative ecosystem to extend service offerings. The domain age and registration details support the legitimacy and stability of the organization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. The Complianz GDPR plugin manages cookie consent effectively, indicating attention to privacy and compliance. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not clearly present, suggesting room for enhancement in defense-in-depth strategies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or responsible disclosure policy to encourage security reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance monitoring of third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MantelZ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MantelZ
Description
MantelZ is an organization that supports informal caregivers (mantelzorgers) and professionals, helping caregivers in the municipalities of Beverwijk, Castricum, Heemskerk, and Uitgeest. They provide information, organize activities, and offer support services free of charge without requiring referrals.
Key services
Support for informal caregivers, Organizing thematic cafés and activities, Providing information and counseling, Volunteer coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent, jQuery, Vue.js (minified)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional non-profit support center for informal caregivers in the Netherlands.
  2. Uses modern WordPress-based technology stack with SEO and privacy compliance plugins.
  3. Includes multiple contact methods and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with popular plugins including Gravity Forms for form management, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Complianz for GDPR cookie consent. It leverages Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The presence of Vue.js suggests some interactive frontend components. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images and videos. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by ARIA roles and skip links. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses Amazon S3 for media assets. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, though some security header enhancements and performance tuning could be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maatjez.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maatjez.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.