Skip to main content

Security report for luxxpr.co.uk

Luxx PR · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luxx PR is a small, specialized public relations agency focusing on luxury food and drinks brands in the United Kingdom. The company, led by Milly Wiggin with over 25 years of experience, offers PR services aimed at building brand reputation and media presence for high-end clients such as Godiva and Jackson Family Wines. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting luxury sector clients. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks like React and is hosted by GoDaddy, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited, lacking cookie consent and detailed privacy policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche, but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luxxpr.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luxx PR operates in a niche luxury retail sector, leveraging long-standing industry relationships and a focused service offering in PR and brand reputation management. The business model is service-based, targeting luxury food and drink brands with tailored media campaigns. The company benefits from a strong market position due to its founder's extensive experience and client testimonials. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and enhancing compliance with evolving privacy regulations. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the company collaborates with notable luxury brands. Revenue streams are likely from retainer and project-based PR services. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital marketing and compliance to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the absence of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which could enhance transparency and trust. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, potentially exposing the company to GDPR compliance risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy including GDPR compliance statements and data protection practices.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security posture.
  4. Create and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster trust and responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luxx PR
Description
Focusing on the luxury food and drinks sector, Luxx PR has worked with Bolney Wine Estate, Godiva, Courvoisier, Ruinart, and currently works with The Jackson Family Wines. Owned and run by Milly Wiggin who has over 25 years of experience in luxury brand PR.
Key services
Public Relations, Media coverage, Brand profile building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Google Fonts
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and focused on luxury PR services.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business claims.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies, notably React, and uses Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, consistent with WHOIS data. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses cache-control headers to prevent caching sensitive data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and SEO metadata completeness. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could enhance user experience and search rankings. No CMS is explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luxxpr.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luxxpr.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.