Skip to main content

Security report for lundhagem.no

Lundhagem · Real Estate · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lundhagem is a small, award-winning architecture and urban design practice based in Oslo, Norway. The website presents a professional image focused on showcasing their design work and company identity. The business targets clients seeking architectural and urban design services, positioning itself as a specialized and reputable firm in its sector. The website uses modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Imgix for image optimization, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible contact information, privacy policies, and security headers, which impacts its overall security posture and compliance stance. No WHOIS data is publicly available, suggesting privacy protection for the domain registration, which is typical for small professional firms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lundhagem.no

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lundhagem.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lundhagem.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, specifically architecture and urban design. It appears to be a small-sized firm with a focused business model providing design services. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, but lacks detailed business information such as founding year or parent company. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the site. The firm likely generates revenue through client projects and architectural services. The absence of contact details and policies may limit customer engagement and trust. The marketing ecosystem includes a third-party script from withcabin.com, possibly for lead generation or user engagement tracking.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security posture due to the absence of security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and contact information for incident response. HTTPS status is unknown from the provided data, but should be verified and enforced. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates limited transparency in security practices. The domain WHOIS is privacy protected, which is common but reduces visibility into registrant legitimacy. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify it is enforced site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lundhagem
Description
Lundhagem is an award-winning architecture and urban design practice based in Oslo
Key services
architecture, urban design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Nuxt.js, Imgix
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
withcabin.com
Marketing tools
withcabin.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional architecture and urban design firm based in Oslo, Norway.
  2. No WHOIS data publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Site uses modern JavaScript framework Nuxt.js and Imgix for image optimization.
  6. No security headers or explicit HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  8. Minimal external links, mostly to image CDN and a third-party script for marketing.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, and uses Imgix for image optimization, indicating a contemporary tech stack. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and CSS stylesheets, with preloading hints for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity. However, accessibility features appear basic and SEO optimization is minimal, with only a meta description present. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, with no obvious broken elements or errors. The site lacks forms or interactive elements, limiting data collection and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lundhagem.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lundhagem.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.