Skip to main content

Security report for lumadirect.com

Luma Direct · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luma Direct operates as a small retail business specializing in eco-friendly textiles and home decor products, offering a range of handcrafted and vintage-inspired items through both an online e-commerce platform and a physical store located in Barnes, London. The website presents a professional design with clear navigation and a focus on sustainable and artisanal products, targeting consumers interested in eco-conscious home decoration. Technically, the site employs Bootstrap and jQuery 1.8.2, along with Google Fonts and Google Maps API, but uses an outdated jQuery version which poses security risks. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and updated libraries. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lumadirect.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luma Direct occupies a niche market segment focused on eco textiles and handcrafted home decor, leveraging both online and physical retail channels. The business model centers on curated product offerings emphasizing sustainability and craftsmanship. The company maintains an active social media presence to engage its target audience. The website's external links include numerous unrelated gambling and suspicious domains, which may indicate potential security or SEO risks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may expose the business to regulatory compliance issues, particularly under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially impacting customer trust and domain ownership verification. Overall, the business appears legitimate in its market but should address technical and compliance gaps to strengthen its position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.2) introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident, and no security contact channels are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance and data protection practices. While no explicit sensitive data exposure was detected, the site would benefit from a comprehensive security audit and implementation of modern security best practices to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  4. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and provide clear security contact information for vulnerability reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luma Direct
Description
Luma Direct is a retail business specializing in eco textiles and home decor products including lighting, bedding, rugs, cushions, vintage fabrics, furniture, ceramics, and gifts. The business emphasizes handcrafted, eco-friendly, and vintage-inspired products.
Key services
Online retail of eco textiles and home decor, Physical store sales, Customer support and order processing
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery 1.8.2, Google Fonts (Bangers, Lato), Google Maps API, Flexslider, Twitter Bootstrap Hover Dropdown, SumoMe script
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by canonical link (https://lumadirect.com)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SumoMe
Marketing tools
SumoMe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a retail e-commerce site specializing in eco textiles and home decor.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration issues or privacy.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Terms and conditions page is present.
  5. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided.
  6. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  7. Multiple external links to gambling-related and suspicious domains in footer and menu, which may be unrelated or spam links.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  9. Site uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical URL but SSL configuration details unknown.
  10. Social media presence is established on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap framework and jQuery 1.8.2, with additional scripts for UI components such as Flexslider and Twitter Bootstrap Hover Dropdown. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are integrated for enhanced user experience. The site uses a custom e-commerce solution with standard HTML5 and CSS3. Performance is moderate with some outdated libraries that may affect security and speed. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal. The hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. The presence of multiple external links to unrelated gambling and suspicious domains may indicate SEO or security risks that should be reviewed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lumadirect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lumadirect.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.