Skip to main content

Security report for ltglink.lt

LTG Link · Transportation · Lithuania

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LTG Link is a major Lithuanian passenger rail transportation company providing train schedules, ticket sales, and additional passenger services including international routes to neighboring countries. The website is professionally designed with comprehensive content and clear navigation, targeting train travelers in Lithuania and the Baltic region. Technically, the site uses modern React framework and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Exponea, hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces trust but the website's branding and content indicate legitimacy. Overall, LTG Link demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ltglink.lt

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ltglink.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
784
Employees
2
Customers
774
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2026-05-27 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ltglink.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –bilietas.ltglink.lt2026-05-27
  • –bilietas.ltglink.lt2025-07-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LTG Link operates as part of the LTG Group, focusing on passenger rail transport in Lithuania and international connections, notably to Latvia and Poland. The company leverages digital ticketing platforms and dynamic pricing models to optimize revenue and customer experience. Its market position is strong as a leading rail service provider with extensive service offerings including VIP lounges, bicycle and pet transport, and mobile app integration. Partnerships with Baltic rail operators and financial institutions support its growth and service expansion. The company targets both individual travelers and business clients, with a focus on sustainable and convenient travel solutions. Growth indicators include increasing passenger numbers and expanded ticket sales channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and secure hosting further enhance security. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent banner and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies indicate gaps in compliance and transparency. No vulnerable libraries or known security issues were detected in the analyzed content. The company should improve privacy compliance mechanisms and provide clear security contact channels to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact information for reporting issues.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Enhance visibility of company contact information including support emails and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LTG Link
Description
Traukinių tvarkaraščiai ir e. bilietai internetu jums patogiu metu | Kur LINK keliausite šiandien?
Key services
Train schedules, Ticket sales (single, terminuotas, dynamic pricing), Additional services (food ordering, bicycle and pet transport, baggage storage), Business client services, VIP lounge access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Exponea (Customer Data Platform), CSS Modules, JavaScript
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies implied
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Exponea
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Exponea
Marketing tools
Exponea
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Strong branding and comprehensive service information for Lithuanian rail passenger transport.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact info likely on other pages.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices observed.
  7. Presence of Exponea for marketing and analytics indicates moderate user tracking.
  8. Multiple official policy pages exist including privacy and terms of service.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React framework with modular CSS and integrates Exponea for customer data management and analytics. Media assets are served from Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating cloud hosting infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. No legacy or vulnerable technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance features and enhance transparency regarding data handling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ltglink.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ltglink.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.