Skip to main content

Security report for lsfp.lv

Latvijas Sporta federāciju padome · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Sporta federāciju padome (LSFP) is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to uniting all recognized sports federations in Latvia to achieve the highest sporting goals. The website serves as a central hub for news, certification information, sports federation registries, and event updates relevant to the Latvian sports community. The organization maintains active social media channels and provides contact information including a physical address and phone number. Technically, the website employs a range of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Chosen, LightSlider, and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and includes a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lsfp.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LSFP holds a central position in the Latvian sports ecosystem as a coordinating body for numerous sports federations, evidenced by the extensive list of linked federation domains. Its business model is non-profit and focused on governance, certification, and support services for sports federations and specialists. The website content is professionally maintained with regular news updates and event information, indicating active engagement with its target audience. The organization leverages partnerships with many Latvian sports federations and promotes national sports initiatives such as #BeActive. The absence of explicit company registration or VAT data on the website is typical for non-profit entities but limits full business transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.1) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly mitigated. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response communication.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations, enhancing legal compliance and user trust.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails for security and general inquiries to improve communication channels.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Sporta federāciju padome
Description
Latvijas Sporta federāciju padomes mērķis ir vienot visas Latvijā atzītās sporta federācijas, lai realizētu visaugstākos sportiskos mērķus.
Key services
Coordination of sports federations, Certification of sports specialists, Information dissemination about sports events and federations, Support and oversight of sports federations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Chosen jQuery plugin, jQuery UI, LightSlider, Conditionizr, CookieConsent (Klaro), Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4, Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. Multiple recognized Latvian sports federations linked and displayed
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and cookie consent tools
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. HTTPS is enforced with valid SSL
  8. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML content
  9. Phone number and physical address clearly displayed in footer
  10. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and several plugins for UI components such as sliders and chosen selects. It uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Google Analytics 4 for visitor tracking. The site is responsive with multiple CSS files targeting different screen widths, indicating good mobile optimization. The presence of cookie consent scripts and configuration shows attention to privacy compliance. Hosting details and CMS are not explicitly detectable from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of some scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present, with some fallback styles for older IE versions. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lsfp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lsfp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.