Skip to main content

Security report for lsag.com

Leder & Schuh AG · Retail · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leder & Schuh AG operates the HUMANIC brand, a well-established shoe retailer and manufacturer with over 150 years of history. The company serves multiple Central and Eastern European markets through both online shops and physical stores, positioning itself as a market leader in Austria and surrounding countries. The website provides comprehensive business and product information, targeting consumers seeking quality footwear internationally. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including SAP Commerce, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing and analytics tools, hosted behind Cloudflare. However, the security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential risks. Privacy compliance is addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies, though some improvements are recommended. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent security enhancements to protect user data and maintain credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lsag.com

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lsag.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
2
Customers
18
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lsag.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –maportal.lsag.com2026-05-25
  • –maportal.lsag.com2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a multi-channel retail model combining e-commerce and brick-and-mortar stores across nine countries. Its long-standing heritage and market leadership in Austria provide competitive advantages. The business model focuses on footwear retail and manufacturing, supported by customer engagement tools like a customer club and newsletters. The partnership ecosystem includes payment providers such as Amazon Payments and marketing platforms like Dynamic Yield. Growth indicators include international expansion and digital marketing investments. Strategic observations suggest focusing on strengthening digital security and enhancing privacy transparency to sustain growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low, primarily due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure communications. While some security headers are present, key features like HSTS enforcement, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing or disabled. The site uses secure cookie flags and a content security policy, indicating some security awareness. Compliance with GDPR is supported by consent management tools. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential data interception and loss of customer trust. Immediate remediation is necessary to align with industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher and disable all insecure protocols to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement and enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.
  6. Enhance privacy policy details and provide clear data retention and processing information.
  7. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
  9. Regularly update and monitor third-party scripts and marketing tools for security compliance.
  10. Maintain consistent branding and trust signals across all digital channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on SAP Commerce (Hybris) platform, using AngularJS for frontend controllers and multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts including Google Tag Manager, Dynamic Yield, and Usercentrics CMP for consent management. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and some security benefits. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential measurement gaps or slow loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and media queries. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and status messages. SEO is basic, with meta tags and structured data but no Open Graph tags detected. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical risk. The site uses multiple external domains for tracking and marketing, which requires careful privacy management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lsag.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lsag.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.