Skip to main content

Security report for lrp.co.uk

L+R · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

L+R is a privately held global investment company specializing in a vertically integrated platform across hotels, commercial real estate, private credit, and ventures. The company targets investors and partners interested in diversified real estate and financial investments. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear business descriptions and navigation, indicating a medium-sized enterprise based in the UK. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with Sanity.io as the CMS and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or explicit policies, and the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Privacy compliance is poor due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lrp.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate, hospitality, and finance sectors, offering investment opportunities and managing assets in hotels, commercial properties, private credit, and ventures. Its business model focuses on private investment partnerships with a vertically integrated approach. The website content and structure suggest a focus on professional investors and partners. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence. The use of modern web technologies and analytics indicates a commitment to digital presence and marketing. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the content.

Security posture

The website currently lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from form-based attacks. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details reduces trust and transparency. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, which may collect user data but no privacy policy is present to inform users. The site uses HTTPS, but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
L+R
Description
L+R is a private investment company offering partners a vertically integrated platform across Hotels, Commercial Real Estate, Private Credit & Ventures.
Key services
Hotels, Commercial Real Estate, Private Credit, Ventures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Sanity.io CDN
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on investment in real estate and hospitality.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the truncated content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, leveraging Sanity.io as a headless CMS. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and uses modern font loading techniques. Performance is moderate with multiple asynchronous script loads. Accessibility features are basic with some focus-visible outlines and semantic HTML elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lrp.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lrp.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.