Skip to main content

Security report for lraa.lv

Latvijas Riepu apsaimniekošanas asociācija · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Riepu apsaimniekošanas asociācija is a Latvian non-governmental organization focused on uniting tire importers, managers, and recyclers to establish a responsible tire import and management system in Latvia. The organization collaborates with government institutions, local and international partners to improve tire recycling and promote sustainable practices. Their projects include innovative asphalt production using recycled tire granules, recognized by the Latvian Academy of Sciences and Riga Technical University. The website reflects a professional presence with clear information about their mission and activities, targeting stakeholders in the tire recycling and environmental sectors in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and standard SEO plugins, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is legitimate and serves as an informational and advocacy platform for tire recycling in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lraa.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche in the environmental and transportation sectors, specifically focusing on tire waste management and recycling in Latvia. It operates as a non-profit association, coordinating industry players and government bodies to improve regulatory frameworks and promote circular economy principles. Their competitive advantage lies in scientific collaboration and recognized projects that innovate in asphalt production using recycled materials. The business model is partnership-driven, relying on cooperation with public institutions and industry stakeholders. Growth indicators include project recognition and pilot implementations of innovative road materials. The partner ecosystem includes environmental organizations and industry associations. The website content and partner logos reinforce credibility and sector focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Riepu apsaimniekošanas asociācija
Description
Latvijas Riepu apsaimniekošanas asociācija is a non-governmental organization uniting tire importers, managers, and recyclers aiming to partner with the state to establish a responsible tire import and management system in Latvia, ensuring collection and recycling of used tires and reuse of secondary raw materials in the economy.
Key services
Coordination of tire importers and recyclers, Promotion of responsible tire import and management systems, Collaboration with government and international partners, Research and development projects on tire recycling and innovative asphalt production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.30.4, jQuery 3.7.1, All in One SEO 4.8.5, Contact Form 7 6.1, Header Footer Elementor 2.4.6
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern WordPress plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
All in One SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and common SEO plugins.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  6. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  7. Content is focused on tire recycling, environmental sustainability, and related projects.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No incident response or security policy information found.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and clear.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and All in One SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery and standard WordPress scripts for functionality. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. However, no advanced performance optimization techniques or CDN usage were identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lraa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lraa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.