Skip to main content

Security report for lpexpress.lt

AB Lietuvos paštas · Transportation · Lithuania

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LP Express, operated by AB Lietuvos paštas, is a prominent parcel delivery and logistics service provider in Lithuania, offering parcel sending via parcel lockers, courier, and postal services domestically and internationally. The website targets both private individuals and businesses, providing self-service options and parcel tracking functionalities. The company holds a strong market position as a key player in the Lithuanian postal sector. Technically, the website is built on a modern Angular framework with PrimeNG UI components, integrating Cookiebot for consent management and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a moderate performance profile. The SSL/TLS configuration is excellent, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs session cookies for security. It features a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS are not evident, and no public security policy or incident response information is provided. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with strong privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the branding and content strongly indicate legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear security incident contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lpexpress.lt

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LP Express operates within the transportation sector, focusing on parcel delivery services. Its business model revolves around providing convenient parcel sending and tracking solutions for both private and business customers. The company leverages digital self-service platforms to enhance customer experience and operational efficiency. Its partnership ecosystem includes major social media platforms for customer engagement and uses third-party analytics and consent management tools. The company’s large size and affiliation with AB Lietuvos paštas position it well for sustained market presence and growth. No direct revenue streams or detailed financial data are disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The use of session cookies and absence of exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not expose any known vulnerabilities or suspicious content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Provide clear contact channels for security incidents, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance data protection officer visibility and provide direct contact information to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AB Lietuvos paštas
Description
LP Express offers parcel sending services via parcel lockers, courier, or mail within Lithuania and to over 200 countries worldwide.
Key services
Parcel sending via parcel lockers, Courier delivery, Postal services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.13, PrimeNG UI components, Cookiebot consent management, Leaflet.js for maps
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of session cookies for security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Analytics
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact info may be on other pages.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn with official company pages.
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or dates extracted.
  7. Website uses modern Angular framework and PrimeNG UI components.
  8. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features observed.
  9. SSL/TLS is properly configured with HTTPS enforced.
  10. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; recommend adding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 18.2.13 with PrimeNG UI components, indicating a modern and maintainable front-end architecture. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Leaflet.js is used for interactive map features, enhancing user experience. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, supporting performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is directly discernible. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through further optimization. The absence of explicit security headers is a technical risk that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lpexpress.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lpexpress.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.