Skip to main content

Security report for lotosbaltica.lt

UAB LOTOS BALTICA · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lotos Baltica is a Lithuanian medium-sized transport company specializing in the refrigerated transportation of perishable goods such as fruits, vegetables, seafood, and frozen products. Established in 2006, it operates a fleet of over 300 trucks registered across Lithuania, Poland, and Norway, serving primarily Northern European markets. The company emphasizes quality service, timely delivery, and compliance with legal and ecological standards. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and active social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common plugins and libraries such as jQuery 1.11.0, Google Fonts, and a 3D Flipbook plugin. While the site is accessible and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, it uses an outdated jQuery version that poses security risks. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No WHOIS data was available to verify domain registration details, which limits trust analysis. However, the business information on the site is consistent and professional, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website scores moderately well in content quality, business credibility, and technical implementation but should address security and privacy gaps to enhance trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in updating libraries, implementing security headers, and adding privacy consent mechanisms are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lotosbaltica.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lotos Baltica holds a stable position in the refrigerated transport sector in Northern Europe, leveraging a sizable fleet and long-term client relationships. Its competitive advantages include specialization in temperature-sensitive cargo, continuous fleet renewal, and dual-driver teams for efficiency. The business model focuses on B2B logistics services with a mission to provide high-quality, compliant transport solutions. Growth indicators include fleet expansion and active social responsibility policies. The company maintains partnerships such as with lotosnordica.no, enhancing its regional presence. The website supports these insights with clear service descriptions and contact channels but lacks detailed financial or market data.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and forms use POST methods, reducing exposure to basic attacks. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with policies present but no explicit consent mechanisms. The site does not expose sensitive data or credentials. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could benefit from formal policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Update jQuery and all plugins/themes to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB LOTOS BALTICA
VAT number
LT100002817211
Registration number
300610241
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB LOTOS BALTICA
Description
Lotos Baltica is a transport company specializing in the transportation of perishable goods such as fruits, vegetables, fish, and other temperature-sensitive products. The company operates a fleet of over 300 trucks registered in Lithuania, Poland, and Norway, serving Northern European countries with a focus on quality and compliance with legal and ecological regulations.
Key services
Transportation of fruits, Transportation of vegetables, Transportation of seafood, Transportation of frozen goods, Other cargo transportation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, WordPress 6.8.1, Google Fonts (Raleway, Varela Round), 3D Flipbook plugin, Fullpage.js, Animate.css
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact form with POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Lithuanian with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Contact form collects name, email, company, and message with required fields for email and message.
  5. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  9. Use of outdated jQuery version poses potential security risk.
  10. No visible security headers in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform version 6.8.1, utilizing common front-end libraries like jQuery 1.11.0, Google Fonts, and plugins including a 3D Flipbook and fullpage.js for UI effects. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs such as ajax.googleapis.com and fonts.googleapis.com. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially for mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, but the use of outdated JavaScript libraries introduces technical debt and security risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization to reduce risk and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lotosbaltica.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lotosbaltica.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.