Skip to main content

Security report for lora.de

on-geo GmbH · Real Estate · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

on-geo GmbH operates a suite of geospatial data service portals including LORA and Geoport, targeting professional users in real estate and related sectors primarily in Germany. The website serves as a secure login gateway for multiple branded services, providing access to geospatial data, consulting, and training. The technical infrastructure is based on Microsoft technologies with ADFS for authentication, delivering a fast and functional user experience with basic mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, modern TLS protocols, and multiple security headers, though improvements are recommended in HSTS configuration and email domain security. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and technical maturity with room for enhancements in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lora.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a medium-sized essential entity in the real estate and technology sectors, providing specialized geospatial data services. Its business model focuses on B2B offerings with multiple portals tailored to different customer segments, including banks, real estate professionals, and consulting clients. The presence of multiple branded portals and support contacts indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. The company maintains a moderate market position in Germany with clear support channels and training offerings. The lack of visible certifications or extensive trust signals suggests potential areas for strengthening market trust and compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced, modern TLS versions (1.2 and 1.3), and key security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. The absence of known SSL vulnerabilities and the use of ADFS for authentication enhance security. However, the HSTS header lacks includeSubDomains and preload flags, OCSP stapling is not enabled, and no DMARC record is present, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are found, indicating limited transparency in security incident handling. The login forms implement client-side validation and password visibility toggling, improving usability without compromising security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS includeSubDomains and preload flags to strengthen transport security.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checks and reduce latency.
  3. Publish and enforce DMARC DNS records to protect against email spoofing and phishing.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR cookie regulations.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Microsoft HTTPAPI with ADFS for authentication, indicating a Windows Server environment. The frontend uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with no heavy frameworks detected. Performance is fast with minimal resource loading. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are limited but present in form labels and error handling. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The DNS setup uses Cloudns.net nameservers without DNSSEC or CAA records, which could be improved for DNS security. Overall, the technical stack is stable and secure but could benefit from modernization in frontend technologies and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lora.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lora.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.