Skip to main content

Security report for londonwall.co.uk

London Wall · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

London Wall is a UK-based company specializing in space solutions through movable walls, sliding folding partitions, and acoustic panels, boasting over 30 years of industry experience. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring flexible space management solutions, positioning itself as an established and reputable provider in the real estate and construction sectors. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by a modern WordPress infrastructure with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content and search optimization. The technical setup includes Google Analytics for visitor insights and CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and security policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the website is well-designed, user-friendly, and trustworthy, but could enhance compliance and security transparency by adding dedicated policy pages and incident response contacts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching londonwall.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention londonwall.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for londonwall.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B business model focused on providing innovative space solutions primarily through movable walls and acoustic products. Their long domain age and consistent branding suggest stable market presence and credibility. The website's integration with social media platforms like LinkedIn and Instagram supports engagement with professional audiences. While no direct contact emails or phone numbers were found, the site includes a contact page likely hosting such details. The use of Google Analytics and cookie consent mechanisms indicates awareness of digital marketing and privacy compliance. However, the lack of visible privacy and terms of service pages may limit full regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a focused product portfolio with a clear target market in the real estate and construction sectors.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management, reflecting a baseline commitment to security and privacy. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and MonsterInsights is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add explicit incident response and abuse contact information to enhance security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
London Wall
Description
With over 30 years experience in creating space solutions using movable walls, sliding folding partitions and acoustic panels, London Wall has built up a strong reputation for delivering innovative solutions and outstanding service.
Key services
Movable walls, Sliding folding partitions, Acoustic panels, Space solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, CookieYes (cookie consent), jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed preferences
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content management and SEO.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user preferences via CookieYes.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Instagram links.
  6. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with opt-out mechanisms.
  7. Website is well-branded and professionally designed with good navigation.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  9. No incident response or security contact information provided.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons, while jQuery supports interactive elements. CookieYes manages cookie consent with a detailed preference modal, demonstrating GDPR awareness. Google Analytics is integrated via MonsterInsights for visitor tracking. The site is hosted by Team Blue Internet Services UK Limited, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with autoplay background video and image carousels, which may impact load times on slower connections. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, with opportunities for improvement in security headers and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with londonwall.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review londonwall.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.