Skip to main content

Security report for lonas.lv

Lonas · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lonas is a Baltic regional furniture retailer operating an e-commerce platform primarily targeting Latvia and neighboring countries. The company offers a variety of furniture collections and home interior products, supported by online shopping and customer service channels. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and MailerLite, alongside a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit privacy and terms of service policies are not clearly found in the provided content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and suitable for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lonas.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lonas.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lonas.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lonas holds a solid position as a regional furniture retailer in the Baltic states, leveraging an e-commerce business model complemented by physical showrooms. The company targets general consumers interested in home furnishings and interior design. The presence of multiple localized partner domains indicates a multi-country market approach. The business model focuses on direct sales and customer engagement through digital marketing and support tools. While the website content is professionally presented and consistent with the brand, the absence of detailed privacy and security policies suggests areas for compliance improvement. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on retail sector growth in the Baltic region.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. The use of cookie consent and third-party script management indicates awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the lack of published incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and data protection officer contact information represents gaps in comprehensive security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The integration of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced with formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add terms of service and security incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  4. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to comply with regulations.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lonas
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lonas
Description
Lonas is a retail company specializing in furniture and home interior products, offering various collections and accessories primarily targeting Latvian and Baltic markets.
Key services
Furniture sales, Interior design consultation, Online shopping platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Freshchat, Hotjar, MailerLite, Cookiebot, jQuery, PrestaShop modules
Frameworks
PrestaShop
Platforms
PrestaShop e-commerce platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Omnisend
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Omnisend
Marketing tools
MailerLite, Freshchat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for furniture retail in Baltic countries.
  2. Uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with consent mechanisms.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in provided content.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers present.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the PrestaShop e-commerce platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery and various PrestaShop modules for enhanced functionality. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Freshchat, and MailerLite, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lonas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lonas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.