Skip to main content

Security report for lom.lv

SIA LOM.LV UZŅĒMUMS · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LOM.LV UZŅĒMUMS is a Latvian small business specializing in scrap metal services including collection, loading, sorting, transportation, dismantling, recycling, and metal scrap reception primarily serving Riga and its region. The website presents a professional and clear business offering with multiple contact methods and a physical address, supporting its legitimacy. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins and libraries such as Elementor, jQuery, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some accessibility features and security headers. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but could be improved by adding security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the visible business information aligns with a legitimate small enterprise. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lom.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the scrap metal and transportation sectors, targeting businesses and partners in Riga, Latvia. Its business model focuses on service provision for scrap metal handling and logistics. The website indicates a regional market position with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The partnership with latea.lv suggests a local business ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from scrap metal purchasing and related services. The company registration number and physical address add credibility. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of a platform and multiple service pages suggest an established operation. The website content is business-focused with no extraneous or unrelated content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear data retention or privacy disclosures. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Review and disclose data retention policies related to analytics and user tracking.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA LOM.LV UZŅĒMUMS
Registration number
40103308081
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA LOM.LV UZŅĒMUMS
Description
LOM.LV UZŅĒMUMS provides a full range of services related to collection, loading, sorting and transportation of scrap metal. Scrap metal is purchased at agreed prices in Riga and Riga's region.
Key services
Prices platform for scrap metal, Dismantling, Recycling and utilization, Metal scrap reception, Transport
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Tooltipster, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  3. Business is a small Latvian scrap metal service provider
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  7. No security headers detected, improvement needed
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info present
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and common JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, and Tooltipster. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. The site uses modern web standards but lacks some security and privacy technical implementations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lom.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lom.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.