Skip to main content

Security report for logwin-logistics.com

Logwin AG · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logwin AG operates an international logistics and transportation services website offering a broad range of services including sea freight, air freight, warehousing, and transport management. The company targets businesses requiring reliable logistics solutions and positions itself as a professional and dedicated provider with a worldwide network. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses modern frontend technologies such as jQuery and Fancybox, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, the technical infrastructure shows weaknesses, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, which significantly impacts the security posture. Security headers are partially implemented, and privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no explicit emails or phone numbers found. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logwin-logistics.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logwin AG is positioned as a large entity in the transportation sector, offering comprehensive logistics services including specialized transport solutions like China Rail Service and Air Charter. The business model focuses on providing end-to-end logistics solutions supported by digital portals for order tracking and online quotes. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and trust signals such as structured data and social media links. The absence of DNS records in the technical data suggests possible DNS misconfiguration or data collection gaps, which could affect domain legitimacy perception. The company leverages Google Analytics for user insights and complies with GDPR through clear cookie and privacy policies. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, which may limit direct customer engagement channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with several critical gaps. While security headers like X-XSS-Protection, Referrer-Policy, and Content-Security-Policy are present, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose the site to significant risks including data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. HSTS is configured but not enabled, and no OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are in place. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which limits the organization's preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate awareness of privacy regulations, but the overall security posture is weakened by fundamental SSL/TLS issues. Immediate remediation of SSL certificate and protocol support is recommended to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher and disable all insecure protocols to ensure encrypted communications.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  6. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and communication.
  7. Regularly audit DNS configurations to ensure consistency and domain legitimacy.
  8. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for broader user reach.
  9. Maintain and update cookie and privacy policies to comply with evolving regulations.
  10. Conduct periodic security assessments to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, utilizing Apache as the web server and several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, and Modernizr for enhanced frontend functionality. The site includes structured data in JSON-LD format and Open Graph meta tags for SEO and social media integration. Despite a professional design and good navigation, the technical infrastructure suffers from missing DNS records in the provided data and a completely invalid SSL configuration, which is a critical risk. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the presence of preloaded fonts and responsive design elements suggest moderate optimization efforts. The site supports multiple languages and includes portals for order tracking and online services. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent attention to SSL and DNS configurations to ensure reliability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logwin-logistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logwin-logistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.