Skip to main content

Security report for logo.dev

Simple Casual, LLC. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logo.dev is a technology company specializing in providing a comprehensive API service that allows developers and businesses to easily integrate high-quality, up-to-date company logos into their websites and applications. The service leverages a global CDN to ensure fast and reliable delivery of millions of brand assets, positioning itself as a niche provider in the brand asset management space. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, targeting developers and businesses seeking efficient branding solutions. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integrations including Clerk.js for authentication and Fathom Analytics for privacy-focused tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy available but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of logo.dev. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logo.dev

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates on an API-as-a-service business model, offering both free and paid tiers to attract a broad developer audience. Its market positioning is focused on simplifying the integration of brand logos, reducing maintenance overhead for clients. The presence of social media channels such as LinkedIn and GitHub indicates active community engagement and transparency. The lack of physical address and phone contact suggests a primarily digital-first operation. The company appears to be small in size, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The business benefits from trust signals like HTTPS, privacy and terms pages, and professional branding, supporting credibility in the competitive technology API market.

Security posture

Logo.dev maintains a solid security foundation with HTTPS and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of Clerk.js suggests secure user authentication practices. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness from a security governance perspective. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is partial, with GDPR indicators limited and no cookie consent mechanism. The overall security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to enhance policy disclosures and user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and incident readiness.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance GDPR compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simple Casual, LLC.
Description
Add high-quality company logos to your site with a single API call. Always up-to-date, millions of brands available.
Key services
Company logo API, Global CDN for logos, Logo updates and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Clerk.js, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies via Clerk.js
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics, Intercom
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers a specialized API service for company logos
  2. Content is well structured and professionally designed
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  4. Contact via email is provided
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, GitHub, and X
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring fast load times and SEO friendliness. Integration of Clerk.js provides robust authentication, while Fathom Analytics offers privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly found, but the use of Next.js suggests a cloud or serverless hosting environment. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logo.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logo.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.