Skip to main content

Security report for logixboard.com

Logixboard, Inc. · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logixboard, Inc. operates a B2B SaaS platform focused on providing a unified customer experience portal for logistics providers, freight forwarders, and customs brokers. The platform integrates multiple logistics services including ocean, air, trucking, customs, and warehousing data to offer comprehensive supply chain visibility. The company positions itself as a differentiated player in the logistics technology market by emphasizing customer experience and seamless integration. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and hosted on WP Engine, leveraging modern web technologies and marketing tools such as HubSpot Analytics and Google Tag Manager. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, which critically undermines its security posture. While security headers are properly configured, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant vulnerability. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is limited but includes a phone number and subscription form. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security and privacy improvements to meet industry standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logixboard.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logixboard targets logistics providers and freight forwarders seeking to enhance customer engagement through technology. Its business model revolves around SaaS delivery of a branded customer portal that consolidates disparate logistics data. The company leverages partnerships with major email and marketing platforms (Google, Salesforce, HubSpot, SendGrid) and uses advanced demo tools to support sales. Customer testimonials and social media presence support its market credibility. The absence of detailed company founding data and physical addresses limits full business profiling. The platform's comprehensive service offering and integration capabilities position it well for growth in the transportation technology sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security maturity with well-implemented HTTP security headers and HSTS enabled. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical security gaps that expose users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security operations. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or privacy policy, which could lead to regulatory risks especially under GDPR. The site should prioritize SSL deployment, update TLS configurations, and implement clear privacy and security policies to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Expand contact information to include verified company emails and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and integrates multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. Hosting is provided by WP Engine, and the site is protected by Cloudflare CDN. Analytics and marketing tools include HubSpot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical debt is moderate due to missing SSL and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logixboard.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logixboard.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.