Skip to main content

Security report for logicor.eu

Logicor · Real Estate · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logicor is a leading European logistics real estate company specializing in owning, managing, and developing properties in key transportation hubs and major population centers across Europe. The company targets businesses and investors seeking logistics real estate solutions, positioning itself as a major player in the European market with a strong network and portfolio. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with comprehensive investor relations and responsible business practices. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Mapbox, and Google Tag Manager, hosted likely on a Sitecore CMS platform, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers are not evident and could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for such enterprises. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and improving direct contact information visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logicor.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logicor operates in the real estate sector focusing on logistics properties across multiple European countries. Its business model revolves around property ownership, management, and development, supporting supply chain and trade flow. The company serves a large customer base with over 2000 customers and 300 employees across 16 countries, indicating a large enterprise scale. The website's investor relations content and alerts service suggest a publicly accountable entity with transparent communication. The company leverages partnerships and a strong network to maintain market leadership. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a structured approach to customer engagement via dedicated pages. The use of multiple tracking and analytics services indicates a data-driven marketing and operational strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Tracking scripts from third parties are present, which requires careful privacy management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance visibility of direct company contact information for security and general inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to ensure privacy compliance and minimize risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logicor
Description
We own, manage and develop logistics real estate in key transportation hubs and close to major population centres across Europe.
Key services
Real estate ownership, Property management, Property development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Slick Carousel, Mapbox GL JS, Google Tag Manager, jsPDF, noUiSlider, html2pdf.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Enterprise Agile Consortium analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
enterpriseagileconsortium.com, usbrowserspeed.com, googletagmanager.com
Marketing tools
Enterprise Agile Consortium tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms implemented
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely on dedicated pages
  4. Strong investor relations and corporate governance signals
  5. Use of multiple external analytics and tracking services
  6. Modern and professional design with good mobile responsiveness
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Mapbox GL JS, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a well-maintained front-end infrastructure. The presence of Sitecore CMS is inferred from Investis Sitecore GTM comments, suggesting enterprise-grade content management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage for libraries. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and ARIA roles. SEO is addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include potential lack of security headers and reliance on multiple third-party tracking scripts, which should be monitored. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logicor.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logicor.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.