Skip to main content

Security report for logi24.lv

Logi24.lv · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logi24.lv is a Latvian-based company specializing in the sale and installation of windows, doors, blinds, and related home comfort products. With approximately 28 years of experience in the EU market, the company offers a range of products including series windows, metal doors, and ventilation solutions, complemented by certified installation services and a warranty of up to 5 years. Their business model combines e-commerce with physical services, targeting homeowners and construction professionals primarily in Latvia and the broader EU region. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Vue.js components, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and features a clear navigation structure. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and WHOIS information was unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust verification. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens for form security, but lacks visible advanced security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its business, with good content quality and user experience. The lack of WHOIS data and some missing security policies slightly reduce the confidence score. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and ensuring WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logi24.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logi24.lv holds a solid position in the regional home improvement market, leveraging nearly three decades of experience. Their competitive advantage lies in combining product sales with certified installation and free measurement services, appealing to both retail customers and professionals. The business model is primarily retail-focused with e-commerce capabilities, supported by a diverse product catalog including windows, doors, blinds, and insulation products. The company targets homeowners and renovation projects within Latvia and the EU, with delivery services across the EU. The presence of certifications and customer reviews supports credibility. Growth indicators include a well-maintained product catalog and active online presence. Partnerships with brands like Penosil and use of trusted payment verification (Paysera) suggest a stable ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens are implemented for form security, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is indicated via privacy and cookie policies, but more explicit security documentation would enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce site but could benefit from enhanced headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain trust and legitimacy verification.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed data retention and user rights information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logi24.lv
Description
Supplier and installer of windows, doors, blinds, and related accessories with 28 years of experience in the EU market, offering warranty up to 5 years and certified installation services.
Key services
Window and door sales, Installation services, Blinds and accessories sales, Free measurement service in Riga, Delivery in EU
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), SVG icons, Owl Carousel, Vue.js components (product-add-to-cart-small), CSRF token usage
Frameworks
Vue.js (inferred from component tags)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • HTTPS enforced (inferred from https URLs)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly displayed with country code +371 (Latvia).
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend audit.
  6. Use of modern front-end technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Vue.js components, Google Fonts, and Owl Carousel for UI elements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating a data-driven approach. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates backend security awareness. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate, with room for optimization. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports business needs but should be enhanced with security best practices and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logi24.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logi24.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.